Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Sep;146(3):573-582.
doi: 10.1378/chest.13-2529.

Variation in decisions to forgo life-sustaining therapies in US ICUs

Affiliations

Variation in decisions to forgo life-sustaining therapies in US ICUs

Caroline M Quill et al. Chest. 2014 Sep.

Abstract

Background: The magnitude and implication of variation in end-of-life decision-making among ICUs in the United States is unknown.

Methods: We reviewed data on decisions to forgo life-sustaining therapy (DFLSTs) in 269,002 patients admitted to 153 ICUs in the United States between 2001 and 2009. We used fixed-effects logistic regression to create a multivariable model for DFLST and then calculated adjusted rates of DFLST for each ICU.

Results: Patient factors associated with increased odds of DFLST included advanced age, female sex, white race, and poor baseline functional status (all P < .001). However, associations with several of these factors varied among ICUs (eg, black race had an OR for DFLST from 0.18 to 2.55 across ICUs). The ICU staffing model was also found to be associated with DFLST, with an open ICU staffing model associated with an increased odds of a DFLST (OR = 1.19). The predicted probability of DFLST varied approximately sixfold among ICUs after adjustment for the fixed patient and ICU effects and was directly correlated with the standardized mortality ratios of ICUs (r = 0.53, 0.41-0.68).

Conclusion: Although patient factors explain much of the variability in DFLST practices, significant effects of ICU culture and practice influence end-of-life decision-making. The observation that an ICU's risk-adjusted propensity to withdraw life support is directly associated with its standardized mortality ratio suggests problems with using the latter as a quality measure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient flowchart showing the rate and outcome of DFLST among patients in the Project IMPACT database.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A, Adjusted odds of DFLST for black patients. Each point represents the adjusted odds of a DFLST for black patients in each ICU accompanied by 95% CI. Results stem from fully adjusted models. The reference is white patients. Total number of ICUs is 105 because ICUs with < 5% black patients were excluded from this analysis. B, Adjusted odds of DFLST for patients ≥ 65 years old. Each point represents the adjusted odds of a DFLST for patients ≥ 65 years old in each ICU accompanied by 95% CI. Results stem from fully adjusted models. The reference is age < 65 years. See Figure 1 legend for expansion of abbreviation.
Figure 3
Figure 3
A, Adjusted predicted probability of DFLST by ICU. The adjusted predicted probability of a DFLST was calculated from the fully adjusted model. The median was 11.5%, with a range from 3.5% to 20.6%. B, Adjusted predicted probability of DFLST by ICU for patients requiring prolonged acute mechanical ventilation (PAMV). The median predicted probability of DFLST among patients requiring PAMV was 32.3%, with a range from 12.3% to 61.7%. See Figure 1 for expansion of other abbreviation.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Adjusted probability of DFLST by ICU and SMR. The adjusted DFLST rate was directly correlated to the corresponding ICU’s SMR (Pearson’s r, 0.53 [0.41–0.68]; P < .001). SMR = standardized mortality ratio. See Figure 1 for expansion of other abbreviation.

Comment in

References

    1. Angus DC, Barnato AE, Linde-Zwirble WT, et al. ; Robert Wood Johnson Foundation ICU End-Of-Life Peer Group. Use of intensive care at the end of life in the United States: an epidemiologic study. Crit Care Med. 2004;32(3):638-643. - PubMed
    1. Prendergast TJ, Claessens MT, Luce JM. A national survey of end-of-life care for critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;158(4):1163-1167. - PubMed
    1. Pochard F, Azoulay E, Chevret S, et al. ; French PROTOCETIC Group. French intensivists do not apply American recommendations regarding decisions to forgo life-sustaining therapy. Crit Care Med. 2001;29(10):1887-1892. - PubMed
    1. Davidson JE, Powers K, Hedayat KM, et al. ; American College of Critical Care Medicine Task Force 2004-2005, Society of Critical Care Medicine. Clinical practice guidelines for support of the family in the patient-centered intensive care unit: American College of Critical Care Medicine Task Force 2004-2005. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(2):605-622. - PubMed
    1. Silveira MJ, Kim SY, Langa KM. Advance directives and outcomes of surrogate decision making before death. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(13):1211-1218. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms