Impact of modality choice on rates of hospitalization in patients eligible for both peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis
- PMID: 24525596
- PMCID: PMC3923691
- DOI: 10.3747/pdi.2012.00257
Impact of modality choice on rates of hospitalization in patients eligible for both peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis
Abstract
Background: Hospitalization rates are a relevant consideration when choosing or recommending a dialysis modality. Previous comparisons of peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD) have not been restricted to individuals who were eligible for both therapies. ♢
Methods: We conducted a multicenter prospective cohort study of people 18 years of age and older who were eligible for both PD and HD, and who started outpatient dialysis between 2007 and 2010 in four Canadian dialysis programs. Zero-inflated negative binomial models, adjusted for baseline patient characteristics, were used to examine the association between modality choice and rates of hospitalization. ♢
Results: The study enrolled 314 patients. A trend in the HD group toward higher rates of hospitalization, observed in the primary analysis, became significant when modality was treated as a time-varying exposure or when the population was restricted to elective outpatient starts in patients with at least 4 months of pre-dialysis care. Cardiovascular disease, infectious complications, and elective surgery were the most common reasons for hospital admission; only 23% of hospital stays were directly related to complications of dialysis or kidney disease. ♢
Conclusions: Efforts to promote PD utilization are unlikely to result in increased rates of hospitalization, and efforts to reduce hospital admissions should focus on potentially avoidable causes of cardiovascular disease and infectious complications.
Keywords: Hemodialysis; hospitalization.
Figures
References
-
- Quinn RR, Laupacis A, Hux JE, Oliver MJ, Austin PC. Predicting the risk of 1-year mortality in incident dialysis patients: accounting for case-mix severity in studies using administrative data. Med Care 2011; 49:257–66 - PubMed
-
- Lee H, Manns B, Taub K, Ghali WA, Dean S, Johnson D, et al. Cost analysis of ongoing care of patients with end-stage renal disease: the impact of dialysis modality and dialysis access. Am J Kidney Dis 2002; 40:611–22 - PubMed
-
- De Vecchi AF, Dratwa M, Wiedemann ME. Healthcare systems and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) therapies—an international review: costs and reimbursement/funding of ESRD therapies. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1999; 14(Suppl 6):31–41 - PubMed
-
- Bovbjerg RR, Diamond LH, Held PJ, Pauly MV. Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: preliminary evidence in the debate over efficacy and cost. Health Aff (Millwood) 1983; 2:96–102 - PubMed
-
- Carlson DM, Duncan DA, Naessens JM, Johnson WJ. Hospitalization in dialysis patients. Mayo Clin Proc 1984; 59:769–75 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
