Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Jun;98(6):739-45.
doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-303888. Epub 2014 Feb 13.

Efficacy and safety of azithromycin 1.5% eye drops in paediatric population with purulent bacterial conjunctivitis

Collaborators, Affiliations
Free PMC article
Randomized Controlled Trial

Efficacy and safety of azithromycin 1.5% eye drops in paediatric population with purulent bacterial conjunctivitis

Dominique Bremond-Gignac et al. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014 Jun.
Free PMC article

Abstract

Objective: To determine the efficacy and safety of azithromycin 1.5% eye drops in a paediatric population with purulent bacterial conjunctivitis.

Patients and methods: This was a multicentre, international, randomised, investigator-masked study in 286 children with purulent discharge and bulbar conjunctival injection. Patients received either azithromycin 1.5% eye drops (twice daily for 3 days) or tobramycin 0.3% eye drops (every 2 h for 2 days, then four times daily for 5 days). Clinical signs were evaluated on day (D) 0, 3 and 7, and cultures on D0 and D7. The primary variable was the clinical cure (absence of bulbar conjunctival injection and discharge) on D3 in the worse eye for patients with positive cultures on D0.

Results: 286 patients (mean age 3.2 years; range 1 day-17 years) were included; 203 had positive cultures on D0. Azithromycin was superior to tobramycin in clinical cure rate on D3 (47.1% vs 28.7%, p=0.013) and was non-inferior to tobramycin on D7 (89.2% vs 78.2%, respectively). Azithromycin treatment eradicated causative pathogens, including resistant species, with a similar resolution rate to tobramycin (89.8% vs 87.2%, respectively). These results were confirmed in a subgroup of patients younger than 24 months old.

Conclusions: Azithromycin 1.5% eye drops provided a more rapid clinical cure than tobramycin 0.3% eye drops in the treatment of purulent bacterial conjunctivitis in children, with a more convenient twice-a-day dosing regimen.

Keywords: Child Health (paediatrics); Conjunctiva; Infection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flow chart.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Clinical cure and bacteriological resolution in the worse eye in patients aged <24 months (microbiologically positive full analysis set, N=112).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. McDonnell PJ. How do general practitioners manage eye disease in the community? Br J Ophthalmol 1988;72:733–6 - PMC - PubMed
    1. McCormick M, Fleming D, Charlton J. Morbidity statistics from general practice: fourth national survey 1991–1992. London: HMSO, 1995
    1. Mah F. Bacterial conjunctivitis in pediatrics and primary care. Pediatr Clin North Am 2006;53:7–10 - PubMed
    1. Syed NA, Chandler JW. Bacterial conjunctivitis. In: Tabbara KF, Hyndiuk RA. eds. Infections of the eye. Vol. 8 2nd edn. Boston, USA: Little, Brown and Co., 1986:69–84
    1. Anonymous. Centers for disease control and prevention. Pneumococcal conjunctivitis at an elementary school-Maine, September 20-December 6, 2002. JAMA 2003;289:1097–8 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms