Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014:2014:309570.
doi: 10.1155/2014/309570. Epub 2014 Jan 8.

Intermuscular fat: a review of the consequences and causes

Affiliations
Review

Intermuscular fat: a review of the consequences and causes

Odessa Addison et al. Int J Endocrinol. 2014.

Abstract

Muscle's structural composition is an important factor underlying muscle strength and physical function in older adults. There is an increasing amount of research to support the clear disassociation between the loss of muscle lean tissue mass and strength with aging. This disassociation implies that factors in addition to lean muscle mass are responsible for the decreases in strength and function seen with aging. Intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT) is a significant predictor of both muscle function and mobility function in older adults and across a wide variety of comorbid conditions such as stroke, spinal cord injury, diabetes, and COPD. IMAT is also implicated in metabolic dysfunction such as insulin resistance. The purpose of this narrative review is to provide a review of the implications of increased IMAT levels in metabolic, muscle, and mobility function. Potential treatment options to mitigate increasing levels of IMAT will also be discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Intermuscular fat is generally considered to be any fat (including the fat between muscle groups and within a muscle) found beneath the fascia of a muscle and is the widest definition for fat beneath the fascia of a muscle. Intramuscular fat is the visible fat found within a muscle. Intermuscular is considered to be an ectopic fat depot similar to visceral adipose tissue (VAT) found in the abdomen.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Muscle injury, obesity, age, disease status, and inactivity are all factors that are associated with increased levels of IMAT. Increased levels of IMAT may also lead to a myriad of metabolic, muscle, and mobility dysfunctions.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Two women with similar age, BMI, and levels of lean muscle mass but with differing levels of IMAT in a cross-sectional MRI image of the thigh. Subject 7 has double the level of IMAT (black within the muscle) in her thigh as subject 44. While both women have similar levels of lean tissue (seen in grey), they have different levels of mobility and muscle function. The increased levels of IMAT and decreased muscle and mobility function of subject 7 are consistent with literature that reports that increased levels of IMAT are associated with decreased muscle and mobility function.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Exercise and weight loss may act to directly decrease IMAT, improve factors associated with increased IMAT such as obesity and inactivity, and improve metabolic, muscle, and mobility dysfunction.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Stehno-Bittel L. Intricacies of fat. Physical Therapy. 2008;88(11):1265–1278. - PubMed
    1. Fischer-Posovszky P, Wabitsch M, Hochberg Z. Endocrinology of adipose tissue—an update. Hormone and Metabolic Research. 2007;39(5):314–321. - PubMed
    1. Sepe A, Tchkonia T, Thomou T, Zamboni M, Kirkland JL. Aging and regional differences in fat cell progenitors—a mini-review. Gerontology. 2010;57(1):66–75. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goodpaster BH, Thaete FL, Simoneau J-A, Kelley DE. Subcutaneous abdominal fat and thigh muscle composition predict insulin sensitivity independently of visceral fat. Diabetes. 1997;46(10):1579–1585. - PubMed
    1. Goodpaster BH, Thaete FL, Kelley DE. Thigh adipose tissue distribution is associated with insulin resistance in obesity and in type 2 diabetes mellitus. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2000;71(4):885–892. - PubMed