Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Feb;1(1):10-16.
doi: 10.1089/wound.2011.0307.

Regulation of Macrophage Polarization and Wound Healing

Affiliations
Review

Regulation of Macrophage Polarization and Wound Healing

Christopher J Ferrante et al. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2012 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Macrophages (Mφs) participate in wound healing by coordinating inflammatory and angiogenic processes. Mφs respond to environmental cues by adopting either "classically" activated (M1) proinflammatory or "alternatively" activated (M2a, M2b, M2c, M2d) wound healing phenotypes.

The problem: Mφ polarization is essential for wound healing and aberrations in this process are linked to several pathologies. It is important to elucidate molecular mechanisms underlying Mφ polarization.

Basic/clinical science advances: Mφs are categorized as proinflammatory (M1) or anti-inflammatory/wound healing (M2). M1 Mφs are observed in initial tissue damage responses, are induced by exogenous pathogen-associated molecular patterns or endogenous damage-associated molecular patterns, and exhibit increased phagocytosis and pro-inflammatory cytokine production, facilitating innate immunity and wound debridement. M2 Mφs predominate later in repair, express vascular endothelial growth factor, transforming growth factor beta, and interleukin 10 (IL-10), are activated by varied stimuli, assist in the resolution of inflammation, and promote tissue formation and remodeling. Recent work has characterized a novel "M2d" phenotype resulting from adenosine-dependent "switching" of M1 Mφs that exhibits a pattern of marker expression that is distinct from canonical IL-4/IL-13-dependent M2a Mφs. Recent studies have demonstrated important roles for specific transcriptional elements in M1 and M2a Mφ polarization, notably members of the interferon regulatory factor family interferon regulatory factor 5 (IRF5) and IRF4, respectively. The role of these IRFs in M2d polarization and wound healing remains to be determined.

Clinical care relevance: Knowledge of microenvironmental signals and molecular mechanisms that mediate Mφ polarization should permit their manipulation to regulate important physiological processes and resolve pathological conditions.

Conclusion: Proper Mφ polarization is essential to effective wound healing, and distinct phenotypes, such as the angiogenic M2d Mφ, may be of critical importance to this process. The IRF5 transcription factor has been shown to play a key role in M1 Mφ activation and the Jumonji domain containing-3-IRF4 pathway has been implicated in M2 Mφ activation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Samuel Joseph Leibovich
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Pathways of Mφ polarization. Nonactivated Mφs are polarized into distinct phenotypes by specific inducing agents and display typical changes in gene expression. Note that not all inducing agents are included and expression profiles for different M2 Mφ subtypes can differ based on the nature of induction.

References

    1. Martinez FO. Helming L. Gordon S. Alternative activation of macrophages: an immunologic functional perspective. Annu Rev Immunol. 2009;27:451–483. - PubMed
    1. Martinez FO. Sica A. Mantovani A. Locati M. Macrophage activation and polarization. Front Biosci. 2008;13:453–461. - PubMed
    1. Zhang X. Mosser DM. Macrophage activation by endogenous danger signals. J Pathol. 2008;214:161–178. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Villalta SA. Rinaldi C. Deng B. Liu G. Fedor B. Tidball JG. Interleukin-10 reduces the pathology of mdx muscular dystrophy by deactivating M1 macrophages and modulating macrophage phenotype. Hum Mol Genet. 2011;20:790–805. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kigerl KA. Gensel JC. Ankeny DP. Alexander JK. Donnelly DJ. Popovich PG. Identification of two distinct macrophage subsets with divergent effects causing either neurotoxicity or regeneration in the injured mouse spinal cord. J Neurosci. 2009;29:13435–13444. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources