Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jun;1(3):127-132.
doi: 10.1089/wound.2011.0333.

Clinically Addressing Biofilm in Chronic Wounds

Affiliations

Clinically Addressing Biofilm in Chronic Wounds

Christopher Attinger et al. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2012 Jun.

Abstract

Background: A chronic wound is a wound that is arrested in the inflammatory phase of wound healing and cannot progress further. Over 90% of chronic wounds contain bacteria and fungi living within a biofilm construct.

The problem: Each aggregation of microbes creates a distinct biofilm with differing characteristics so that a clinical approach has to be tailored to the specifics of a given biofilm. Defining the characteristics of that biofilm and then designing a therapeutic option particular to that biofilm is currently being defined.

Basic/clinical science advances: Biofilm becomes resistant to therapeutic maneuvers at 48-96 h after formation. By repeatedly attacking it on a regular schedule, one forces biofilm to reattach and reform during which time it is susceptible to antibiotics and host defenses. Identifying the multiple bacteria and fungi that make up a specific biofilm using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) allows directed therapeutic maneuvers such as application of specific topical antibiotics and biocides to increase the effectiveness of the debridement.

Clinical care relevance: Most chronic wounds contain biofilm that perpetuate the inflammatory phase of wound healing. Combining debridement with using PCR to identify the bacteria and fungi within the biofilm allows for more targeted therapeutic maneuvers to eliminate a given biofilm.

Conclusion: Therapeutic options in addition to debridement are currently being evaluated to address biofilm. Using PCR to direct adjunctive therapeutic maneuvers may increase the effectiveness of addressing biofilm in a chronic wound.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Christopher Attinger
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Graphical illustration of the effects of biofilm-based wound care. The goal of biofilm-based wound care is to ensure the therapy maintains its balance within the healing window, as described in the text. It can be assumed from this figure that, without concurrent strategy, the frequency of debridement could be increased to keep the wound from falling below the healing stall point. Debridement remains the primary tool for ensuring the wound stays above the stall point.

References

    1. Cornell RS. Meyr AJ. Steinberg JS. Attinger CE. Debridement of the noninfected wound. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52:31S. - PubMed
    1. Clark RA. Oxidative stress and “senescent” fibroblasts in non-healing wounds as potential therapeutic targets. J Invest Dermatol. 2008;128:2361. - PubMed
    1. Morasso MI. Tomic-Canic M. Epidermal stem cells: the cradle of epidermal determination, differentiation, and wound healing. Biol Cell. 2005;97:173. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cho KH. Caparon MG. Patterns of virulence gene expression differ between biofilm and tissue communities of Streptococcus pyogenes. Mol Microbiol. 2005;57:6–1545. - PubMed
    1. Steed DL. Donohoe D. Webster MW. Lindsley L. Effect of extensive debridement and treatment on the healing of diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetic Ulcer Study Group. J Am Coll Surg. 1996;183:61. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources