Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Feb 17:12:30.
doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-12-30.

In-/off-label use of biologic therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus

Affiliations
Review

In-/off-label use of biologic therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus

Mariele Gatto et al. BMC Med. .

Abstract

Current therapies for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) include corticosteroids as a persistent mainstay and traditional immunosuppressants which are given according to disease severity, organ involvement and patient status. No treatment entails certain efficacy devoid of mild-to-moderate adverse effects. Nowadays, novel therapies are being developed aiming to target specific molecules involved in SLE development and progression which show variable effectiveness and safety. Biologic agents considered for SLE comprise monoclonal antibodies (chimeric, humanized or fully human) as well as fusion molecules or antibody fragments mostly consisting of B cell-targeted therapies beside anti-cytokines as well as T cell-targeted therapies. Encouraging evidence on biologics is mostly provided by case series or uncontrolled studies; conversely, larger randomized controlled clinical trials have frequently missed their primary endpoints with the exception of BLISS-52 and BLISS-76 trials. Actually, apart from belimumab, biologics are employed in clinical practice as off-label treatments for lupus and results are often promising, depending on specific SLE features, dose regimens and individual responsiveness.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Stohl W. Future prospects in biologic therapy for systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2013;9:705–720. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2013.136. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Merrill JT, Neuwelt CM, Wallace DJ, Shanahan JC, Latinis KM, Oates JC, Utset TO, Gordon C, Isenberg DA, Hsieh HJ, Zhang D, Brunetta PG. Efficacy and safety of rituximab in moderately-to-severe active systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62:222–233. doi: 10.1002/art.27233. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Furie R. Efficacy and safety of rituximab in subjects with active proliferative lupus nephritis (LN): results from the randomized, double-blind, phase III LUNAR study. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60:16–21. - PubMed
    1. Postal M, Costallat LT, Appenzeller S. Biological therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus. Int J Rheumatol. 2012;2012:578641. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wallace DJ, Kalunian K, Petri MA, Strand V, Houssiau FA, Pike M, Kilgallen B, Bongardt S, Barry A, Kelley L, Gordon C. Efficacy and safety of epratuzumab in patients with moderate/severe active systemic lupus erythematosus: results from EMBLEM, a phase IIb, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73:183–190. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202760. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms