Cost-effectiveness of a potential group B streptococcal vaccine program for pregnant women in South Africa
- PMID: 24530145
- DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.01.062
Cost-effectiveness of a potential group B streptococcal vaccine program for pregnant women in South Africa
Abstract
Background: In low- and middle-income countries neonatal infections are important causes of infant mortality. Group B streptococcus (GBS) is a major pathogen. A GBS polysaccharide-protein conjugate vaccine, the only option that has the potential to prevent both early- and late-onset GBS disease, has completed Phase II trials. Screening-based intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) for pregnant women, an effective strategy in high-income countries, is often not practical in these settings. Risk factor-based IAP (RFB-IAP) for women with risk factors at delivery has had limited success in preventing neonatal infection. We evaluated the cost and health impacts of maternal GBS vaccination in South Africa.
Methods and findings: We developed a decision-analytic model for an annual cohort of pregnant women that simulates the natural history of GBS disease in their infants. We compared four strategies: doing nothing, maternal GBS vaccination, RFB-IAP, and vaccination plus RFB-IAP. Assuming vaccine efficacy varies from 50% to 90% against covered serotypes and 75% of pregnant women are vaccinated, GBS vaccination alone prevents 30-54% of infant GBS cases compared to doing nothing. For vaccine prices between $10 and $30, and mid-range efficacy, its cost ranges from $676 to $2390 per disability-adjusted life-year (DALY) averted ($US 2010), compared to doing nothing. RFB-IAP alone, compared to doing nothing, prevents 10% of infant GBS cases at a cost of $240/DALY. Vaccine plus RFB-IAP prevents 48% of cases at a cost of $664-2128/DALY.
Conclusions: Vaccination would substantially reduce the burden of infant GBS disease in South Africa and would be very cost-effective by WHO guidelines. RFB-IAP is also very cost-effective, but prevents only 10% of cases. Vaccination plus RFB-IAP is more effective and more costly than vaccination alone, and consistently very cost-effective.
Keywords: Cost-effectiveness; GBS vaccine; Group B streptococcal (GBS); Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP); Neonatal sepsis; South Africa.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Prevention of group B streptococcal disease in the first 3 months of life: would routine maternal immunization during pregnancy be cost-effective?Vaccine. 2014 Aug 20;32(37):4778-85. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.06.003. Epub 2014 Jun 30. Vaccine. 2014. PMID: 24992717
-
Cost-effectiveness of a potential group B streptococcal vaccine for pregnant women in the United States.Vaccine. 2017 Oct 27;35(45):6238-6247. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.08.085. Epub 2017 Sep 23. Vaccine. 2017. PMID: 28951085
-
Considerations for a phase-III trial to evaluate a group B Streptococcus polysaccharide-protein conjugate vaccine in pregnant women for the prevention of early- and late-onset invasive disease in young-infants.Vaccine. 2013 Aug 28;31 Suppl 4:D52-7. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.02.029. Vaccine. 2013. PMID: 23973347 Review.
-
Cost-effectiveness analysis of maternal immunisation against group B Streptococcus (GBS) disease: A modelling study.Vaccine. 2018 Nov 12;36(46):7033-7042. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.09.058. Epub 2018 Oct 4. Vaccine. 2018. PMID: 30293765
-
Preventing neonatal group B streptococcal infection. Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis in some high-risk situations.Prescrire Int. 2011 Mar;20(114):72-7. Prescrire Int. 2011. PMID: 21648230 Review.
Cited by
-
Group B Streptococcus vaccine development: present status and future considerations, with emphasis on perspectives for low and middle income countries.F1000Res. 2016 Sep 22;5:2355. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.9363.1. eCollection 2016. F1000Res. 2016. PMID: 27803803 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Disease Burden of Group B Streptococcus Among Infants in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis.Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2016 Sep;35(9):933-42. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000001233. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2016. PMID: 27213263 Free PMC article.
-
Vaccines for Streptococcus agalactiae: current status and future perspectives.Front Immunol. 2024 Jun 14;15:1430901. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1430901. eCollection 2024. Front Immunol. 2024. PMID: 38947337 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Group B Streptococcus colonization rate and serotype distribution among pregnant women and their newborns at Adama Hospital Medical College, Ethiopia.Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 9;10(1):9301. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-66474-z. Sci Rep. 2020. PMID: 32518331 Free PMC article.
-
A Vaccine Against Group B Streptococcus: Recent Advances.Infect Drug Resist. 2020 Apr 29;13:1263-1272. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S203454. eCollection 2020. Infect Drug Resist. 2020. PMID: 32425562 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials