Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Apr;3(2):89-100.
doi: 10.1007/s40037-014-0110-7.

Medical students with low self-efficacy bolstered by calling to medical speciality

Joel B Goodin  1 , Ryan D Duffy, Nicole J Borges, Catherine A Ulman, Vanessa M D'Brot, R Stephen Manuel
Affiliations

Medical students with low self-efficacy bolstered by calling to medical speciality

Joel B Goodin et al. Perspect Med Educ. 2014 Apr.

Abstract

This study was performed to understand the degree to which medical students' self-efficacy (SE) moderates the influence of calling on students' speciality commitment, emphasizing the need to understand variables that predict primary care specialization. The researchers hypothesized that students who perceived their career as a calling would be more committed to their speciality, especially when students had high SE. Medical students (Years 1-4; N = 152) completed an online survey to rate their calling, speciality commitment, and SE. Calling was measured by the Brief Calling scale (Dik et al., J Career Assess 20:242-263, 2012), while speciality choice was measured by Hollenbeck et al. (J Appl Psychol 74:18-23, 1989) measure of commitment. SE was measured by the Jerusalem and Schwarzer's general SE scale (see Scholz et al., Eur J Psychol Assess 18:242-51, 2002). Calling (r = 0.24, p < 0.01) and SE (r = 0.20, p < 0.05) were found to moderately correlate with speciality commitment, thus emphasizing the possibility that they may have an interaction. The interaction of calling and SE significantly predicted speciality commitment (β = -0.20, t(148) = -2.55, p < 0.05) and explained a significant proportion of variance in speciality commitment (R (2) = 0.12, F(3, 148) = 6.875, p < 0.001). Students with a high presence of calling may have high speciality commitment, despite low SE.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Self-efficacy as a moderator in the relation of calling and speciality commitment
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Phillips RL Jr, Dodoo MS, Petterson S, Xierali I, Bazemore A, Teevan B, et al.; Robert Graham Center [Internet]. Speciality and geographic distribution of the physician workforce: what influences medical student and resident choices? http://www.graham-center.org/online/graham/home/publications/monographs-... (2009). Accessed 30 Sep 2013.
    1. American Medical Association [Internet]. Transitioning to residency. http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/about-ama/our-people/membergroups-sectio... (2013). Accessed 30 Sep 2013.
    1. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84:191–215. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Duffy RD, Allan BA, Autin KL, Bott EM. Calling and life satisfaction: it’s not about having it, it’s about living it. J Couns Psychol. 2013;60:42–52. doi: 10.1037/a0030635. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Borges NJ, Manuel RS, Duffy RD. Speciality interests and calling to the vocation of medicine among first year medical students. Perspect Med Educ. 2013;2:14–17. doi: 10.1007/s40037-012-0037-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources