Does curve convexity affect the surgical outcomes of thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?
- PMID: 24532048
- DOI: 10.1007/s00590-014-1425-0
Does curve convexity affect the surgical outcomes of thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?
Abstract
Background: Major left thoracic (LT) curve is an atypical type in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and showed independent clinical characteristics and natural history compared to major right thoracic (RT) curve. However, it's unclear whether the convexity of major thoracic curve would affect the surgical outcomes and risk of complications. A retrospective follow-up study was conducted to investigate whether the convexity of major thoracic curve would affect the surgical outcomes of patients with main thoracic AIS.
Methods: Twelve LT-AIS patients underwent corrective spinal instrumentation and fusion were retrieved, and twelve patients with main RT-AIS matched for gender, chronological age, curve type, magnitude and surgical strategy were selected as control. All patients underwent at least 2-year follow-up. The pre- and post-operative radiographic parameters, intraoperative data and functional outcome assessed by Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire 22 (SRS-22) were analyzed and compared between two groups.
Results: Patients with LT- and RT-AIS presented with similar magnitudes of thoracic curves, flexibility, fusion level and correction rate. Compared with RT-AIS, patients with LT-AIS showed longer operation time (average, 364 vs. 348 min) and larger amount intraoperative estimated blood loss (2,060 vs. 1,720 ml) although the differences were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). With at least 2-year follow-up, patients in two groups showed comparable loss of correction, coronal and sagittal balance, and the sagittal profiles. With regard to functional outcome, the scores of five categories of SRS-22 questionnaire were similar between two groups. No neurological or vascular complication was observed in these patients.
Conclusions: The radiographic and functional outcomes of LT-AIS patients underwent operation were comparable to those with RT-AIS. Longer operation time and more intraoperative blood loss may be expected in instrumentation and fusion for patients with LT-AIS, which might be because of the inconvenience on the surgical procedure.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of anterior and posterior instrumentation for correction of adolescent thoracic idiopathic scoliosis.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999 Feb 1;24(3):225-39. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199902010-00007. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999. PMID: 10025017 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparative analysis of hook, hybrid, and pedicle screw instrumentation in the posterior treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.J Pediatr Orthop. 2012 Jul-Aug;32(5):490-9. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e318250c629. J Pediatr Orthop. 2012. PMID: 22706465
-
Apical vertebral derotation in the posterior treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: myth or reality?Eur Spine J. 2013 Feb;22(2):313-23. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2372-2. Epub 2012 Aug 7. Eur Spine J. 2013. PMID: 22868455 Free PMC article.
-
Selective Thoracic Fusion of Lenke I and II Curves Affects Sagittal Profiles But Not Sagittal or Spinopelvic Alignment: A Case-Control Study.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Jun 15;40(12):926-34. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000861. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015. PMID: 26067149 Review.
-
Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hook instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Sep 15;29(18):2040-8. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000138268.12324.1a. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004. PMID: 15371706 Review.
Cited by
-
Left-sided thoracic curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: are the outcomes different?Spine Deform. 2025 Jul;13(4):1067-1074. doi: 10.1007/s43390-025-01069-0. Epub 2025 Apr 2. Spine Deform. 2025. PMID: 40172835 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical