Identification of pathologically small fetuses using customized, ultrasound and population-based growth norms
- PMID: 24532059
- DOI: 10.1002/uog.13333
Identification of pathologically small fetuses using customized, ultrasound and population-based growth norms
Abstract
Objectives: Fetal growth restriction is a strong risk factor for stillbirth. We compared the performance of three fetal growth curves - customized, ultrasound (Hadlock) and population - in identifying abnormally grown fetuses at risk of stillbirth.
Methods: We performed a case-control study of singleton stillbirths (delivered between 2000 and 2010) at one center. Four liveborn controls were randomly identified for each stillbirth. Ultrasound-estimated fetal weight within 1 month prior to delivery was used to calculate growth percentiles for each fetus using three fetal growth norms. Sensitivities and odds ratios for stillbirth, as well as odds of abnormal growth according to formula, were calculated.
Results: There were 49 stillbirths and 197 live births. Using the customized norms, growth of the fetuses destined to be stillborn was bimodal, with both more small-for-gestational-age (SGA; < 10(th) percentile) and large-for-gestational-age (LGA; ≥ 90(th) percentile) fetuses. Odds of being abnormally grown were significantly higher using ultrasound compared with population norms (P = 0.02) but were not statistically different using ultrasound and customized norms (P = 0.21). Sensitivity for identification of SGA on ultrasound as a predictor of stillbirth was higher using customized (39%; 95% CI, 24-54%) or ultrasound (33%; 95% CI, 19-47%), rather than population (14%; 95% CI, 4-25%), norms.
Conclusions: Among fetuses destined to be stillborn, customized and ultrasound norms identified a greater proportion of both SGA and LGA estimated fetal weights. The customized norms performed best in identifying death among SGA fetuses. These results should be interpreted within the limitations of the study design.
Keywords: IUFD; IUGR; LGA; SGA; customized; fetal growth; growth potential; intrauterine fetal death; stillbirth.
Copyright © 2014 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Stillbirths at Term: Case Control Study of Risk Factors, Growth Status and Placental Histology.PLoS One. 2016 Dec 9;11(12):e0166514. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166514. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27936018 Free PMC article.
-
Customized growth charts for twin gestations to optimize identification of small-for-gestational age fetuses at risk of intrauterine fetal death.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jun;41(6):637-42. doi: 10.1002/uog.12404. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013. PMID: 23334992
-
Predictive accuracy of Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK) chorionicity-specific twin growth charts for stillbirth: a validation study.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Feb;53(2):193-199. doi: 10.1002/uog.19069. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 29660172
-
Stillbirth at term: Does size really matter?Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020 Sep;150(3):299-305. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13229. Epub 2020 Jun 16. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020. PMID: 32438457 Review.
-
[Prevalence, risk factors, maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality of intrauterine growth restriction and small-for-gestational age].J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2013 Dec;42(8):895-910. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2013.09.013. Epub 2013 Nov 9. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2013. PMID: 24216305 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Stillbirths at Term: Case Control Study of Risk Factors, Growth Status and Placental Histology.PLoS One. 2016 Dec 9;11(12):e0166514. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166514. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27936018 Free PMC article.
-
Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome by fetal biometry: comparison of customized and population-based standards.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Feb;55(2):177-188. doi: 10.1002/uog.20299. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 31006913 Free PMC article.
-
Prediction of Late-Onset Small for Gestational Age and Fetal Growth Restriction by Fetal Biometry at 35 Weeks and Impact of Ultrasound-Delivery Interval: Comparison of Six Fetal Growth Standards.J Clin Med. 2021 Jul 3;10(13):2984. doi: 10.3390/jcm10132984. J Clin Med. 2021. PMID: 34279466 Free PMC article.
-
A new customized fetal growth standard for African American women: the PRB/NICHD Detroit study.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;218(2S):S679-S691.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.229. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018. PMID: 29422207 Free PMC article.
-
Biochemical tests of placental function versus ultrasound assessment of fetal size for stillbirth and small-for-gestational-age infants.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 May 14;5(5):CD012245. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012245.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 31087568 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical