Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2014 Feb 17:14:72.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-72.

Public and private pregnancy care in Reggio Emilia Province: an observational study on appropriateness of care and delivery outcomes

Laura Bonvicini, Silvia Candela, Andrea Evangelista, Daniela Bertani, Morena Casoli, Annarella Lusvardi, Antonella Messori, Paolo Giorgi Rossi  1
Affiliations
Observational Study

Public and private pregnancy care in Reggio Emilia Province: an observational study on appropriateness of care and delivery outcomes

Laura Bonvicini et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: In industrialized countries, improvements have been made in both maternal and newborn health. While attention to antenatal care is increasing, excessive medicalization is also becoming more common.The aim of this study is to compare caesarean section (CS) frequency and ultrasound scan utilization in a public model of care involving both midwives and obstetricians with a private model in which care is provided by obstetricians only.

Design: Observational population-based study.

Setting: Reggio Emilia Province.

Population: 5957 women resident in the province who delivered between October 2010 and November 2011.

Main outcome measures: CS frequency and ultrasound scan utilization, stillbirths, and other negative perinatal outcomes. Women in the study were searched in the public family and reproductive health clinic medical records to identify those cared for in the public system. Outcomes of the two antenatal care models were compared through multivariate logistic regression adjusting for maternal characteristics and, for CS only, by stratifying by Robson's Group.

Results: Compared to women cared for in private services (N = 3,043), those in public service (N = 2,369) were younger, less educated, more frequently non-Italian, and multiparous. The probability of CS was slightly higher for women cared for by private obstetricians than for those cared for in the public system (31.8% vs. 27.1%; adjusted odds ratio: 1.10; 95% CI: 0.93-1.29): The probability of having more than 3 ultrasound scans was higher in private care (89.6% vs. 49.8%; adjusted odds ratio: 5.11; 95% CI: 4.30-6.08). CS frequency was higher in private care for all Robson's classes except women who underwent CS during spontaneous labour. Among negative perinatal outcomes only a higher risk of pre-term birth was observed for pregnancies cared for in private services.

Conclusions: The public model provides less medicalized and more guidelines-oriented care than does the private model, with no increase in negative perinatal outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Number of women in the study and assistance characteristics.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. EURO – PERISTAT. European Perinatal Health Report – Health and Care of Pregnant Women and Babies in Europe in 2010. 2013. pp. 77–83. Available at URL: http://www.europeristat.com/images/doc/Peristat%202013%20V2.pdf.
    1. World Health Organisation. Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet. 1985;2(8452):436–437. - PubMed
    1. Banta D. What is the efficacy/effectiveness of antenatal care and the financial and organizational implications? Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2003. Available at URL: http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/74662/E82996.pdf.
    1. Sistema nazionale per le linee guida. Taglio cesareo: una scelta appropriata e consapevole – Seconda Parte. Roma: SNGL-ISS; 2012. Available at URL: http://www.snlg-iss.it/lgn_cesareo_II_parte.
    1. Istituto Nazionale di Statistica (ISTAT) Annuario di statistiche demografiche. Roma: ISTAT; 1980.

Publication types