[Radiation exposure of surgical staff during sentinel node surgery. Is there a risk for the surgeon and his team?]
- PMID: 24533993
- DOI: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2014.01.007
[Radiation exposure of surgical staff during sentinel node surgery. Is there a risk for the surgeon and his team?]
Abstract
Objective: Assess the radiation exposure of surgical staff during sentinel node surgery in gynecology using a radiotracer, the (99m)Tc-microalbumin.
Materials and methods: A monocentric, prospective study was conducted during 3 months representing 40 sentinel node surgical procedures with different dosimetric measurements. Dosimeters were used to evaluate the whole body and the fingers radiation exposure for all exposed workers (surgeon, nurse and surgical assistant). Another dosimeter was used to estimate the atmospheric radiation level. The activity of (99m)Tc-microalbumin was 50.1±2.4MBq when the surgery was performed the same day and 90.4±3.2MBq when the surgery was performed the day after.
Results: Radioactive doses received during each procedure by the surgeon, surgical assistant and nurse are 5, 3.75 and 0μSv for whole body exposure and 17.5, 15.6 and 16.2μSv for extremities respectively. Atmosphere dosimeter does not detect any radiation over this period. On average, 200 procedures are performed each year in our hospital by 7 surgeons. Surgeon's radiation exposure remains below the threshold of 1mSv annual for whole body and 50mSv annual for fingers set for public by the International Commission on Radiological Protection.
Discussion and conclusions: During sentinel node surgery radiation exposure of surgical staff is weak. Everyone, including the surgeon, receives a dose below the limits of the public radiation exposure. There is no need for special dosimetric monitoring or use radiation protective devices during the sentinel node surgery using (99m)Tc-microalbumin injection.
Keywords: Dosimeter; Dosimètre; Ganglion sentinelle; Irradiation du personnel; Nanocoll; Radiation exposure; Radioprotection; Sentinel node.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
[Response of Lina Tibi, Nicolas Clauss, Elise Enderlin, Fabrice Hubele, Izzie Jacques Namer, and Carole Mathelin to the article by M. Bailly et al. ].Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2014 Jun;42(6):467-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2014.04.004. Epub 2014 May 22. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2014. PMID: 24857535 French. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
