Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Apr;28(3):417-28.
doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2014.01.005. Epub 2014 Jan 28.

The role of ultrasound in the diagnosis of fetal genetic syndromes

Shayna N Conner  1 , Ryan E Longman  2 , Alison G Cahill  2
Affiliations
Review

The role of ultrasound in the diagnosis of fetal genetic syndromes

Shayna N Conner et al. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2014 Apr.

Abstract

The use of ultrasound in the prenatal diagnosis of fetal genetic syndromes is rapidly evolving. Advancing technology and new research findings are aiding in the increased accuracy of ultrasound-based diagnosis in combination with other methods of non-invasive and invasive fetal testing. Ultrasound as a screening tool for aneuploidy and other anomalies is increasingly being used throughout pregnancy, beginning in the first trimester. Given the number of recorded syndromes, it is important to identify patterns and establish a strategy for identifying abnormalities on ultrasound. These syndromes encompass a wide range of causes from viral, substance-linked, chromosomal, and other genetic syndromes. Despite the ability of those experienced in ultrasound, it is important to note that not all fetal genetic syndromes can be identified prenatally, and even common syndromes often have no associated ultrasound findings. Here, we review the role of ultrasound in the diagnosis of fetal genetic syndromes.

Keywords: anomalies; genetic; syndrome; ultrasound.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Two-dimensional image of bilateral cleft lip.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Three-dimensional image of a unilateral cleft lip.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Ultrasound image of placentamegaly.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Ultrasound image of an echogenic intra-cardiac focus.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Ultrasound image of pyelectasis.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Ultrasound image of large septated cystic hygroma.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Goncalves LF, Nien JK, Espinoza J, et al. What does two-dimensional imaging add to 3- and 4-dimensional obstetric ultrasonography? J Ultrasound Med. 2006;25:691–699. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dyson RL, Pretorius DH, Budorick NE, et al. Three-dimensional ultrasound in the evaluation of fetal anomalies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000;16:321–328. - PubMed
    1. Merz E, Welter C. Two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound in the evaluation of normal and abnormal fetal anatomy in the second and third trimesters in a level III center. Ultraschall Med. 2005;26:9–16. - PubMed
    1. Scharf A, Ghazwiny MF, Steinborn A, et al. Evaluation of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional ultrasound in obstetric diagnostics: a prospective study. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2001;16:333–341. - PubMed
    1. Merz E, Abramowicz JS. Three-dimensional /four-dimensional ultrasound in prenatal diagnosis: is it time for routine use? Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2012;55:336–351. - PubMed