Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Feb;17(92):101-14.

Implementation of biomarker-driven cancer therapy: existing tools and remaining gaps

Affiliations
Review

Implementation of biomarker-driven cancer therapy: existing tools and remaining gaps

Ann M Bailey et al. Discov Med. 2014 Feb.

Abstract

There has been growing interest in biomarker-driven personalized cancer therapy, also known as precision medicine. Recently, dozens of molecular tests, including next generation sequencing, have been developed to detect biomarkers that have the potential to predict response of cancers to particular targeted therapies. However, detection of cancer-related biomarkers is only the first step in the battle. Deciding what therapy options to pursue can also be daunting, especially when tumors harbor more than one potentially actionable aberration. Further, different mutations/variants in a single gene may have different functional consequences, and response to targeted agents may be context dependent. However, early clinical trials with new molecular entities are increasingly conducted in a biomarker-selected fashion, and even when trials are not biomarker-selected, much effort is placed on enrolling patients onto clinical trials where they have the highest probability of response. We review available molecular tests and therapy discerning tools, including tools available for assessing functional consequences of molecular alterations and tools for finding applicable clinical trials, which exist to help bridge the gap between detection of cancer-related biomarker to the initiation of biomarker-matched targeted therapies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure Statement

No conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, are declared by the author(s).

References

    1. Ascierto PA, Schadendorf D, Berking C, Agarwala SS, Van Herpen CM, Queirolo P, Blank CU, Hauschild A, Beck JT, St-Pierre A, Niazi F, Wandel S, Peters M, Zubel A, Dummer R. MEK162 for patients with advanced melanoma harbouring NRAS or Val600 BRAF mutations: a non-randomised, open-label phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(3):249–256. - PubMed
    1. Averette-Byers L, Diao L, Wang J, Girard L, Peyton M, Gazdar A, Groth P, Paul J, Liu N, Kim ES, Mauro D, Herbst RS, Papadimitrakopoulou V, Coombes KR, Weinstein JN, Minna JD, Heymach J. LKB1 and KRAS mutations predict resistance to PI3K/Akt inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Res. 2012;72(8 Supplement):5605. abstr.
    1. Bollag G, Hirth P, Tsai J, Zhang J, Ibrahim PN, Cho H, Spevak W, Zhang C, Zhang Y, Habets G, Burton EA, Wong B, Tsang G, West BL, Powell B, Shellooe R, Marimuthu A, Nguyen H, Zhang KY, Artis DR, et al. Clinical efficacy of a RAF inhibitor needs broad target blockade in BRAF-mutant melanoma. Nature. 2010;467(7315):596–599. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chapman PB, Hauschild A, Robert C, Haanen JB, Ascierto P, Larkin J, Dummer R, Garbe C, Testori A, Maio M, Hogg D, Lorigan P, Lebbe C, Jouary T, Schadendorf D, Ribas A, O'day SJ, Sosman JA, Kirkwood JM, Eggermont AM, et al. Improved survival with vemurafenib in melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(26):2507–2516. - PMC - PubMed
    1. De Mattos-Arruda L, Dienstmann R, Tabernero J. Development of molecular biomarkers in individualized treatment of colorectal cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2011;10(4):279–289. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances