Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Feb 13;9(2):e87917.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087917. eCollection 2014.

Asymmetric segregation of damaged cellular components in spatially structured multicellular organisms

Affiliations

Asymmetric segregation of damaged cellular components in spatially structured multicellular organisms

Charlotte Strandkvist et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

The asymmetric distribution of damaged cellular components has been observed in species ranging from fission yeast to humans. To study the potential advantages of damage segregation, we have developed a mathematical model describing ageing mammalian tissue, that is, a multicellular system of somatic cells that do not rejuvenate at cell division. To illustrate the applicability of the model, we specifically consider damage incurred by mutations to mitochondrial DNA, which are thought to be implicated in the mammalian ageing process. We show analytically that the asymmetric distribution of damaged cellular components reduces the overall damage level and increases the longevity of the cell population. Motivated by the experimental reports of damage segregation in human embryonic stem cells, dividing symmetrically with respect to cell-fate, we extend the model to consider spatially structured systems of cells. Imposing spatial structure reduces, but does not eliminate, the advantage of asymmetric division over symmetric division. The results suggest that damage partitioning could be a common strategy for reducing the accumulation of damage in a wider range of cell types than previously thought.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic presentation of one time step of the computational model.
Different colors correspond to different damage levels. In each time step of the computational model, a cell is selected at random. The cell has a probability of going apoptotic, given by its damage level formula image, in which case another random cell, with damage level formula image, proliferates to replace it. If the selected cell does not go apoptotic, it remains in the cell population unchanged. The probability that the mitochondrial genome has acquired additional damage formula image since the last cell division is formula image. The daughter cells therefore have a probability formula image of inheriting a damage level of formula image and a probability formula image of inheriting additional damage. This may be distributed symmetrically, with both cells receiving formula image damage, or it may be segregated asymmetrically, leading to one cell with a damage level of formula image and one with a damage level of formula image. We define one time unit of the simulation to be formula image time steps, such that, on average, each cell is selected once per time unit.
Figure 2
Figure 2. a) Damage level development.
Cell populations that divide asymmetrically have a smaller average damage level formula image and a higher fraction formula image of cells with the initial damage level, compared to cells that divide symmetrically. When the number of undamaged cells fluctuates down to zero, the average damage level will quickly increase from the steady state value formula image to 1, corresponding to a system collapse. This happens after a characteristic time formula image. Parameters used: formula image, formula image, formula image, formula image. Other choices of parameters yield similar results. b) Stability of steady state. The time formula image before system collapse decreases with the mutation probability formula image and increases with higher mitochondrial fragility formula image. Notably, cell populations that divide asymmetrically stay in steady state for much longer time than populations with symmetric division. White circles represent the set of parameters used in panel a.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Effect of spatial structure and damage segregation.
For well mixed systems, where apoptotic cells can be replaced by any other dividing cell in the population, the time formula image before system collapse increases drastically with the number of cells in the population. In systems with spatial structure, where apoptotic cells can only be replaced by neighboring cells, formula image saturates with increasing formula image, corresponding to an €effective system size for each cell. Both for spatial and well mixed systems, asymmetric division significantly increases the longevity of the cell population compared to symmetrically dividing populations of the same size. Notice that the asymmetric well mixed system has been studied using smaller cell populations due to the more rapid divergence of formula image relative to the symmetric well mixed system. Each data point represents the median time before collapse out of 20 simulations. Parameters used: formula image, formula image, formula image. Other choices of parameters yield similar results.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Time development of a spatially organized cell population that divides symmetrically (a) and asymmetrically (b).
Initially, all cells have damage level formula image, but soon clusters of damaged cells occur. The boundary between damaged and less damaged clusters performs a random walk with a drift towards the more damaged cells, since these are less likely to go apoptotic. Eventually the system will collapse to a state where all cells have damage level formula image. This happens much sooner for a symmetrically dividing cell population than for one that divides asymmetrically. The parameters are: formula image, formula image, formula image. Other choices of parameters yield similar results.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wallace D (1999) Mitochondrial diseases in man and mouse. Science 283: 1482–1488. - PubMed
    1. Neumüller R, Knoblich J (2009) Dividing cellular asymmetry: asymmetric cell division and its implications for stem cells and cancer. Genes & development 23: 2675–2699. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Klinger H, Rinnerthaler M, Lam Y, Laun P, Heeren G, et al. (2010) Quantitation of (a) symmetric inheritance of functional and of oxidatively damaged mitochondrial aconitase in the cell division of old yeast mother cells. Experimental gerontology 45: 533–542. - PubMed
    1. Passos J, Saretzki G, Ahmed S, Nelson G, Richter T, et al. (2007) Mitochondrial dysfunction accounts for the stochastic heterogeneity in telomere-dependent senescence. PLoS biology 5: e110. - PMC - PubMed
    1. McFaline-Figueroa JR, Vevea J, Swayne TC, Zhou C, Liu C, et al. (2011) Mitochondrial quality control during inheritance is associated with lifespan and mother–daughter age asymmetry in budding yeast. Aging cell 10: 885–895. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances