Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Feb 13;9(2):e88958.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088958. eCollection 2014.

Continental-scale assessment of risk to the Australian odonata from climate change

Affiliations

Continental-scale assessment of risk to the Australian odonata from climate change

Alex A Bush et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Climate change is expected to have substantial impacts on the composition of freshwater communities, and many species are threatened by the loss of climatically suitable habitat. In this study we identify Australian Odonata (dragonflies and damselflies) vulnerable to the effects of climate change on the basis of exposure, sensitivity and pressure to disperse in the future. We used an ensemble of species distribution models to predict the distribution of 270 (85%) species of Australian Odonata, continent-wide at the subcatchment scale, and for both current and future climates using two emissions scenarios each for 2055 and 2085. Exposure was scored according to the departure of temperature, precipitation and hydrology from current conditions. Sensitivity accounted for change in the area and suitability of projected climatic habitat, and pressure to disperse combined measurements of average habitat shifts and the loss experienced with lower dispersal rates. Streams and rivers important to future conservation efforts were identified based on the sensitivity-weighted sum of habitat suitability for the most vulnerable species. The overall extent of suitable habitat declined for 56-69% of the species modelled by 2085 depending on emissions scenario. The proportion of species at risk across all components (exposure, sensitivity, pressure to disperse) varied between 7 and 17% from 2055 to 2085 and a further 3-17% of species were also projected to be at high risk due to declines that did not require range shifts. If dispersal to Tasmania was limited, many south-eastern species are at significantly increased risk. Conservation efforts will need to focus on creating and preserving freshwater refugia as part of a broader conservation strategy that improves connectivity and promotes adaptive range shifts. The significant predicted shifts in suitable habitat could potentially exceed the dispersal capacity of Odonata and highlights the challenge faced by other freshwater species.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Categories of vulnerability to climate change.
The effects of climate change on a species were based on three components: exposure, sensitivity and dispersal pressure. Possible adaptation options are given for species at risk under multiple components (adapted from [40]).
Figure 2
Figure 2. Modelled probability of species dispersal with distance from known records.
Under current conditions (solid line) suitability is reduced around 300 km, and extended to 630 km (2055) and 1080 km (2085) under future climate change scenarios.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Percentage of species (n = 270) found to be vulnerable to climate change according to their exposure, sensitivity and predicted pressure to disperse.
Species are most vulnerable if they are at risk in all components (Category 1).
Figure 4
Figure 4. Predicted suitable habitat in south-eastern Australia under current climate and 2055 and 2085 using emissions scenario RCP8.5 for Notoaeschna sagittata, Coenagrion lyelli and Petalura gigantea.
High suitability is in dark green.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Map of conservation priorities for Odonata vulnerable to climate change in Categories 1 and 2.
The panels show priorities in dark blue for (a) Australia, and regional views of (b) Tasmania, (c) the north-west, (d) Cape York peninsula, (e) the south-west and (f) the south-east.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Vörösmarty CJ, McIntyre PB, Gessner MO, Dudgeon D, Prusevich A, et al. (2010) Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature 467: 555–561. - PubMed
    1. Durance I, Ormerod SJ (2007) Climate change effects on upland stream macroinvertebrates over a 25-year period. Global Change Biology 13: 942–957.
    1. Ricciardi A, Rasmussen JB (1999) Extinction rates of North American freshwater fauna. Conservation Biology 13: 1220–1222.
    1. Flenner IDA, Richter O, Suhling F (2009) Rising temperature and development in dragonfly populations at different latitudes. Freshwater Biology 55: 397–410.
    1. Floury M, Usseglio-Polatera P, Ferreol M, Delattre C, Souchon Y (2012) Global climate change in large European rivers: long-term effects on macroinvertebrate communities and potential local confounding factors. Global Change Biology 19: 1085–1099. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources