Patient informed governance of distributed research networks: results and discussion from six patient focus groups
- PMID: 24551383
- PMCID: PMC3900224
Patient informed governance of distributed research networks: results and discussion from six patient focus groups
Abstract
Understanding how to govern emerging distributed research networks is essential to their success. Distributed research networks aggregate patient medical data from many institutions leaving data within the local provider security system. While much is known about patients' views on secondary medical research, little is known about their views on governance of research networks. We conducted six focus groups with patients from three medical centers across the U.S. to understand their perspectives on privacy, consent, and ethical concerns of sharing their data as part of research networks. Participants positively endorsed sharing their health data with these networks believing that doing so could advance healthcare knowledge. However, patients expressed several concerns regarding security and broader ethical issues such as commercialism, public benefit, and social responsibility. We suggest that network governance guidelines move beyond strict technical requirements and address wider socio-ethical concerns by fully including patients in governance processes.
Similar articles
-
Data governance requirements for distributed clinical research networks: triangulating perspectives of diverse stakeholders.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):714-9. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002308. Epub 2013 Dec 3. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014. PMID: 24302285 Free PMC article.
-
Security and privacy requirements for a multi-institutional cancer research data grid: an interview-based study.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2009 Jun 15;9:31. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-9-31. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2009. PMID: 19527521 Free PMC article.
-
Privacy and security requirements of distributed computer based patient records.Int J Biomed Comput. 1994 Feb;35 Suppl:57-64. Int J Biomed Comput. 1994. PMID: 8188423
-
Genome privacy: challenges, technical approaches to mitigate risk, and ethical considerations in the United States.Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2017 Jan;1387(1):73-83. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13259. Epub 2016 Sep 28. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2017. PMID: 27681358 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Patients' and public views and attitudes towards the sharing of health data for research: a narrative review of the empirical evidence.J Med Ethics. 2022 Jan;48(1):3-13. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105651. Epub 2019 Nov 12. J Med Ethics. 2022. PMID: 31719155 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Patients' and Members of the Public's Wishes Regarding Transparency in the Context of Secondary Use of Health Data: Scoping Review.J Med Internet Res. 2023 Apr 13;25:e45002. doi: 10.2196/45002. J Med Internet Res. 2023. PMID: 37052967 Free PMC article.
-
Mining the Data: Exploring Rural Patients' Attitudes about the Use of Their Personal Information in Research.AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2022 Apr-Jun;13(2):89-106. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2022.2040644. Epub 2022 Mar 10. AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2022. PMID: 35271430 Free PMC article.
-
Patient knowledge and information-seeking about personalized cancer therapy.Int J Med Inform. 2016 Apr;88:52-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.01.005. Epub 2016 Jan 18. Int J Med Inform. 2016. PMID: 26878762 Free PMC article.
-
Sharing my health data: a survey of data sharing preferences of healthy individuals.AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2014 Nov 14;2014:1699-708. eCollection 2014. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2014. PMID: 25954442 Free PMC article.
-
iCONCUR: informed consent for clinical data and bio-sample use for research.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Mar 1;24(2):380-387. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw115. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017. PMID: 27589942 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ohno-Machado L, Day ME, El-Kareh R, et al. Technical report: Standards in the use of collaborative or distributed data networks in patient centered outcomes research. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) 2012. Available from: http://pcori.org/assets/pdfs/Standards%20Outcomes%20Research.pdf.
-
- Irwin A. Hackett EJ, Amsterdamska O, Lynch M, Wacjman J, editors. STS perspectives on scientific governance. The handbook of science and technology studies. third edition. 2008. pp. 583–607.
-
- Graham J, Amos B, Plumptre T, for the Institute on Governance Principles of good governance in the 21st century: Policy brief no. 15. 2003.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources