Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Nov 16:2013:1579-88.
eCollection 2013.

Supporting information use and retention of pre-hospital information during trauma resuscitation: a qualitative study of pre-hospital communications and information needs

Zhan Zhang  1 , Aleksandra Sarcevic  1 , Randall S Burd  2
Affiliations

Supporting information use and retention of pre-hospital information during trauma resuscitation: a qualitative study of pre-hospital communications and information needs

Zhan Zhang et al. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. .

Abstract

Pre-hospital communication is a critical first step towards ensuring efficient management of critically injured patients during trauma resuscitation. Information about incoming patients received from the field and en route serves a critical role in helping emergency medical teams prepare for patient care. Despite many efforts, inefficiencies persist. In this paper, we examine the pre-hospital communications between pre-hospital and hospital providers, including the types of information transferred during en-route calls, as well as the information needs of trauma teams. Our findings show that Emergency Medical Services (EMS) teams report a great deal of information from the field, most of which match the needs of trauma teams. We discuss design implications for a computerized system to support the use and retention of pre-hospital information during trauma resuscitation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Current ways of presenting pre-hospital information to trauma teams in US Level 1 trauma centers.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Information types identified in EMS-ECIC communications, grouped into six high-level categories. Dark bars indicate the number of communications in which the information was reported by EMS teams. Gray bars indicate the number of communications in which the information was requested by ECIC teams.
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
A sample of communications (events) showing their structure. T = Transportation, D = Demographics, M = Mechanism of injury, I = Injuries, TG = Treatments given, P = Physical findings.
Figure 4:
Figure 4:
Macro-level vs. micro-level structure of pre-hospital communications. Top rows show the macro-level structure for two events. Bottom rows show the micro-level structure for the same two events.
Figure 5:
Figure 5:
Pre-hospital information needs, ranked by the number of participants who expressed the need for a particular information type.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Barach P, Weinger MB. Trauma team performance. In: Wilson WC, Grande CM, Hoyt DB, editors. Trauma: Emergency resuscitation, perioperative anesthesia, surgical management. New York, NY: Informa Healthcare USA, Inc; 2007.
    1. Xiao Y, Kim YJ, Gardner SD, Faraj S, MacKenzie CF. Communication technology in trauma centers: a national survey. J Emerg Med. 2006 Jan;30(1):21–8. - PubMed
    1. Rowlands A. An evaluation of pre-hospital communication between ambulances and an accident and emergency department. J Telemed Telecare. 2003;9(Suppl 1):S35–7. - PubMed
    1. Harrison JF, Cooke MW. Study of early warning of accident and emergency departments by ambulance services. J Accid Emerg Med. 1999 Sep;16(5):339–41. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sarcevic A, Burd RS. Information handover in time-critical work. ACM Conf Supporting Group Work Proc; 2009. pp. 301–310.

Publication types

MeSH terms