Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Feb 19:14:76.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-76.

The scale of repeat prescribing--time for an update

Affiliations

The scale of repeat prescribing--time for an update

Duncan R Petty et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: The NHS spends billions of pounds annually on repeat prescriptions in primary care, but data on their extent and use is out of date. Understanding the scale of repeat prescribing and for whom it is prescribed is important for the NHS to plan services and develop policies to improve patient care.

Method: Anonymous data on prescription numbers and practice population demographics was obtained from GP computer systems in a large urban area.Searches were conducted in November 2011 to identify the numbers of repeat items listed on individuals' repeat lists by sex and age.The proportion of all prescription items issued as repeats was identified by conducting searches on items issued as repeat and acute prescriptions.

Results: In the year of study 4,453,225 items were issued of which 3,444,769 (77%) were repeats (mean 13 items per patient/annum) and 1,008,456 (23%) acute prescriptions (mean 3.9 items per patient per annum). The mean number of repeat Items per patient was 1.87 (range 0.45 ages 0-9 years; 7.1 ages 80-89 years). At least one repeat medicine was prescribed to 43% of the population (range 20% for ages 0-9; over 75% for ages 60+).

Conclusion: A significant proportion of the population receive repeat prescriptions and the proportion increases with age. Whilst the proportion of repeat items to acute items has remained unchanged over the last two decades the number of repeat prescriptions items issued has doubled (from 5.8 to 13.3 items/patient/annum). This has implications for general practice workload, patient convenience, NHS costs and risk.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The percentage of patients receiving at least one repeat prescription, by age and sex.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean number of medicines per patient on repeats.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Swinglehurst D, Greenhalgh T, Russell J, Myall M. Receptionist input to quality and safety in repeat prescribing in UK general practice: ethnographic case study. BMJ. 2011. doi:10.1136/bmj.d6788. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Duerden M, Millson D, Avery A, Smart S. The quality of GP prescribing: an inquiry into the quality of general practice prescribing in England. London: The King's Fund; 2011.
    1. Avery AJ. Repeat prescribing in general practice. BMJ. 2011. doi:10.1136/bmj.d7089. - PubMed
    1. Harris CM, Dajda R. The scale of repeat prescribing. Br J Gen Pract. 1996;14(412):649–653. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Prescriptions by General Medical Practitioners in Wales. 2012-13. http://wales.gov.uk/statistics-and-research/prescriptions-general-medica.... Accessed 5th March 2014.