Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2014 May;29(5):611-22.
doi: 10.1007/s00384-014-1836-8. Epub 2014 Feb 21.

STARR with CONTOUR® TRANSTAR™ device for obstructed defecation syndrome: one-year real-world outcomes of the European TRANSTAR registry

Collaborators, Affiliations
Clinical Trial

STARR with CONTOUR® TRANSTAR™ device for obstructed defecation syndrome: one-year real-world outcomes of the European TRANSTAR registry

G Ribaric et al. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014 May.

Abstract

Purpose: Stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) in patients with obstructive defecation syndrome (ODS) is limited by the capacity of the circular stapler used. This prospective cohort study was conducted to assess real-world clinical outcomes of STARR with the new CONTOUR® TRANSTAR™ device, shortly named TRANSTAR, at 12 months postoperatively.

Methods: From January 2009 to January 2011, consecutive patients who underwent TRANSTAR in 22 European colorectal centers were enrolled in the study. Functional outcomes and quality of life were assessed by the changes in a number of scoring systems (Knowles-Eccersley-Scott-Symptom (KESS) score, ODS score, St. Mark's score, Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) score, and Patient Assessment of Constipation-Quality of Life (PAC-QoL) score), at 12 months as compared to baseline. All complications were recorded and analyzed.

Results: A total of 100 patients (98% female), mean age 60 years, were entered in the study. Statistically significant improvements were seen in the KESS (median 18 vs. 6; p < 0.01), ODS (median 15 vs. 4; p < 0.01), and PAC-Qol scores (median 2.10 vs. 0.86; p < 0.01). St. Mark's and EQ-5D scores improved nonsignificantly. Complications were reported in 11 % of patients, including bleeding (5%), staple line complications (3%), urinary retention (2%), and persistent pain (1%). No major complications or mortality occurred.

Conclusion: TRANSTAR facilitated a tailored, real circumferential full-thickness rectal resection, leading to improved patient functional and quality of life outcomes at 12 months postoperatively. It represents a safe and effective treatment for ODS in local clinical practice, although the sustainability of real-world results needs to be proven in the long-term follow-up.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Comparisons of study scores mean values at baseline and 12 months postoperatively. Statistically significant improvements were observed in the KESS, ODS, and PAC-QoL scores at 12 months as compared with baseline (*Wilcoxon signed ranks test and paired samples t test, both P < 0.01)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Comparisons of study scores median values at baseline and 12 months postoperatively. Statistically significant improvements were observed in the KESS, ODS, and PAC-QoL scores at 12 months as compared with baseline (*Wilcoxon signed ranks test and paired samples t test, both P < 0.01)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Odds ratio (OR) for ODS calculated from KESS score assuming the preoperative symptoms would remain unchanged in an untreated control group. TRANSTAR significantly reduce the risk of ODS by ten times (OR = 10.6) at 12 months postoperatively, when a median of ≥10 for KESS score was used as a cut-off criterion between constipated and non-constipated groups
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Odds ratio (OR) for fecal incontinence, pain, and urgency calculated from KESS score and St. Marks score assuming the preoperative symptoms would remain unchanged in an untreated control group. TRANSTAR significantly reduce the risk of fecal incontinence (OR = 0.30) and abdominal pain (OR = 0.32) and nonsignificantly increase the risk of urgency (OR = 1.15) at 12 months postoperatively

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jayne DG, Finan PJ. Stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defaecation and evidence-based practice. Br J Surg. 2005;92:793–794. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5092. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jayne D, Stuto A (Eds) (2009) Transanal stapling techniques for anorectal prolapse. London, Springer-Verlag London Limited. ISBN 978-1-84800-904-2
    1. Schwandner O, Farke S, Bruch HP. Stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) for obstructed defection caused by rectocele and rectoanal intussusception. Viszeralchirurgie. 2005;40:331–341. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-872460. - DOI
    1. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence . Interventional procedure guidance 169: stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defaecation syndrome. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2006.
    1. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence . Interventional procedure guidance 351: stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defaecation syndrome. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2010.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources