H-indices of Academic Pediatricians of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
- PMID: 24554795
- PMCID: PMC3916174
- DOI: 10.5455/aim.2013.21.234-236
H-indices of Academic Pediatricians of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
Abstract
Background: Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar are three major sources which provide h-indices for individual researchers. In this study we aimed to compare the h-indices of the academic pediatricians of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences obtained from the above mentioned sources.
Method: Academic pediatrician who had at least 5 ISI indexed articles entered the study. Information required for evaluating the h-indices of the included researchers were retrieved from official websites Web of Science (WOS), Scopus, and Google Scholar (GS). Correlations between obtained h-indices from the mentioned databases were analyzed using Spearrman correlation coefficient. Ranks of each researcher according to each database h-index were also evaluated.
Results: In general, 16 pediatricians entered the study. Computed h-indices for individual authors were different in each database. Correlations between obtained h-indices were: 0.439 (ISI and Scopus), 0.488 (ISI and GS), and 0.810 (Scopus and GS). Despite differences between evaluated h-indices in each database for individual authors, the rankings according to these h-indices were almost similar.
Conclusion: Although h-indices supplied by WOS, SCOPUS, and GS can be used interchangeably, their differences should be acknowledged. Setting up "ReasercherID" in WOS and "User profile" in GS, and giving regular feedback to SCOPUS can increase the validity of the calculated h-indices.
Keywords: Google Scholar; H-index.; ISI; Mashhad; Pediatric; SCOPUS; Web of Science.
Similar articles
-
Citation Analysis of Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences in ISI Web of Knowledge, Scopus, and Google Scholar.Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2013 Oct;16(10):1027-30. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2013. PMID: 24379959 Free PMC article.
-
Coverage of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science: a case study of the h-index in nursing.Nurs Outlook. 2012 Nov-Dec;60(6):391-400. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2012.04.007. Epub 2012 Jun 30. Nurs Outlook. 2012. PMID: 22748758
-
The difference in referencing in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar.ESC Heart Fail. 2019 Dec;6(6):1291-1312. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12583. Epub 2019 Dec 30. ESC Heart Fail. 2019. PMID: 31886636 Free PMC article.
-
Scientific impact of Iran University of Medical Sciences researchers in ResearchGate, Google Scholar, and Scopus: An altmetrics study.Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2020 Oct 22;34:142. doi: 10.34171/mjiri.34.142. eCollection 2020. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2020. PMID: 33437738 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Google Scholar and the h-index in biomedicine: the popularization of bibliometric assessment].Med Intensiva. 2013 Jun-Jul;37(5):343-54. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2013.01.008. Epub 2013 Mar 19. Med Intensiva. 2013. PMID: 23517697 Review. Spanish.
References
-
- Thomaz PG, Assad RS, Moreira LF. Using the impact factor and H index to assess researchers and publications. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2011;96(2):90–93. - PubMed
-
- Aoun SG, Bendok BR, Rahme RJ, et al. Standardizing the Evaluation of Scientific and Academic Performance in Neurosurgery-Critical Review of the “h” Index and its Variants. World Neurosurg. 2012 - PubMed
-
- De Groote SL, Raszewski R. Coverage of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science: A case study of the h-index in nursing. Nurs Outlook. 2012 - PubMed
-
- Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, Pappas G. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J. 2008;22(2):338–342. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources