Drug delivery using composite scaffolds in the context of bone tissue engineering
- PMID: 24554923
- PMCID: PMC3917575
Drug delivery using composite scaffolds in the context of bone tissue engineering
Abstract
Introduction: Due to the disadvantages of the current bone autograft and allograft in many clinical condition in which bone regeneration is required in large quantity, engineered biomaterials combined with growth factors, such as bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2), have been demonstrated to be an effective approach in bone tissue engineering, since they can act both as a scaffold and as a drug delivery system to promote bone repair and regeneration.
Area covered: Recent advantages in the field of engineered scaffolds have been obtained from the investigation of composite scaffolds designed by the combination of bioceramics, especially hydroxyapatite (HA), and biodegradable polymers, such as poly (D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) and chitosan, in order to realize osteoconductive structures that can mimic the natural properties of bone tissue. Herein it is demonstrated that the incorporation of BMP-2 into different composite scaffolds, by encapsulation, absorption or entrapment, could be advantageous in terms of osteoinduction for new bone tissue engineered scaffolds as drug delivery systems and some of them should be further analyzed to optimized the drug release for future therapeutic applications.
Expert opinion: New design concepts and fabrication techniques represent novel challenges for further investigations about the development of scaffolds as a drug delivery system for bone tissue regeneration.
Keywords: bone morphogenetic protein-2; bone tissue engineering; composite scaffold; drug delivery.
Similar articles
-
Fabrication and characterization of PLGA/HAp composite scaffolds for delivery of BMP-2 plasmid DNA.J Control Release. 2007 Jul 16;120(1-2):111-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2007.03.018. Epub 2007 Apr 1. J Control Release. 2007. PMID: 17512077
-
Tissue-engineered composite scaffold of poly(lactide-co-glycolide) and hydroxyapatite nanoparticles seeded with autologous mesenchymal stem cells for bone regeneration.J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2017 Nov.;18(11):963-976. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1600412. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2017. PMID: 29119734 Free PMC article.
-
Anti-infective efficacy, cytocompatibility and biocompatibility of a 3D-printed osteoconductive composite scaffold functionalized with quaternized chitosan.Acta Biomater. 2016 Dec;46:112-128. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.09.035. Epub 2016 Sep 26. Acta Biomater. 2016. PMID: 27686039
-
Composite polymer-bioceramic scaffolds with drug delivery capability for bone tissue engineering.Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2013 Oct;10(10):1353-65. doi: 10.1517/17425247.2013.808183. Epub 2013 Jun 19. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2013. PMID: 23777443 Review.
-
Cellulose-based composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering and localized drug delivery.Bioact Mater. 2022 May 26;20:137-163. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.05.018. eCollection 2023 Feb. Bioact Mater. 2022. PMID: 35663339 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Biomaterial-assisted local and systemic delivery of bioactive agents for bone repair.Acta Biomater. 2019 Jul 15;93:152-168. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.01.060. Epub 2019 Jan 31. Acta Biomater. 2019. PMID: 30711659 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Drug eluting bioactive glass ceramics for fusion in spondylodiscitis: a pilot study.Neurosurg Rev. 2024 Feb 14;47(1):80. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-02317-z. Neurosurg Rev. 2024. PMID: 38355838
-
Novel Vanadium-Loaded Ordered Collagen Scaffold Promotes Osteochondral Differentiation of Bone Marrow Progenitor Cells.Int J Biomater. 2016;2016:1486350. doi: 10.1155/2016/1486350. Epub 2016 May 11. Int J Biomater. 2016. PMID: 27293438 Free PMC article.
-
Proteomics of regenerated tissue in response to a titanium implant with a bioactive surface in a rat tibial defect model.Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 28;10(1):18493. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-75527-2. Sci Rep. 2020. PMID: 33116264 Free PMC article.
-
Impact Strengthening of Laminated Kevlar/Epoxy Composites by Nanoparticle Reinforcement.Polymers (Basel). 2020 Nov 27;12(12):2814. doi: 10.3390/polym12122814. Polymers (Basel). 2020. PMID: 33261001 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bauer TW, Muschler GF. Bone graft materials. An overview of the basic science. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;371:10–27. - PubMed
-
- Arrington ED, Smith WJ, Chambers HG, et al. Complications of iliac crest bone graft harvesting. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;329:300–9. - PubMed
-
- Banwart JC, Asher MA, Hassanein RS. Iliac crest bone graft harvest donor site morbidity. A statistical evaluation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995;20(9):1055–60. - PubMed
-
- Ahlmann E, Patzakis M, Roidis N, et al. Comparison of anterior and posterior iliac crest bone grafts in terms of harvest-site morbidity and functional outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84-A(5):716–20. - PubMed
-
- St John TA, Vaccaro AR, Sah AP, et al. Physical and monetary costs associated with autogenous bone graft harvesting. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 2003;32(1):18–23. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources