Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jul 2:2:146.
doi: 10.12688/f1000research.2-146.v1. eCollection 2013.

Pollinator declines: reconciling scales and implications for ecosystem services

Affiliations

Pollinator declines: reconciling scales and implications for ecosystem services

Ignasi Bartomeus et al. F1000Res. .

Abstract

Despite the widespread concern about the fate of pollinators and the ecosystem services they deliver, we still have surprisingly scarce scientific data on the magnitude of pollinator declines and its actual contribution to crop pollination and food security. We use recently published data from northeastern North America to show that studies at both the local and regional scales are needed to understand pollinator declines, and that species-specific responses to global change are broadly consistent across scales. Second, we show that bee species that are currently delivering most of the ecosystem services (i.e. crop pollination) are not among the species showing declining trends, but rather appear to thrive in human-dominated landscapes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: No competing interests disclosed.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Trend in bee species' relative abundance in northeastern North American calculated over the period 1870–2011.
A) For species that either became locally extinct or persisted in Carleville, Illinois. B) For species that either are not ecosystem-service providers to crops (non-ESP), are at least occasionally ecosystem-service providers to crops (ESP), or are among the species cumulatively responsible for 90% of the pollinator visitation to at least one crop (main ESP). Regional data from Bartomeus et al. , local data from Burkle et al. and crop pollinator data from Garibaldi et al. .

References

    1. Potts SG, Biesmeijer JC, Kremen C, et al. : Global pollinator declines: Trends, impacts and drivers. Trends Ecol Evol. 2010;25(6):345–353 10.1016/j.tree.2010.01.007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Burkle LA, Marlin JC, Knight TM: Plant-pollinator interactions over 120 years: loss of species, co-occurrence, and function. Science. 2013;339(6127):1611–1615 10.1126/science.1232728 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Garibaldi LA, Steffan-Dewenter I, Winfree R, et al. : Wild pollinators enhance fruit set of crops regardless of honey bee abundance. Science. 2013;339(6127):1608–1611 10.1126/science.1230200 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tylianakis JM: Ecology. The global plight of pollinators. Science. 2013;339(6127):1532–1533 10.1126/science.1235464 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bartomeus I, Ascher JS, Gibbs J, et al. : Historical changes in northeastern US bee pollinators related to shared ecological traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(12):4656–4660 10.1073/pnas.1218503110 - DOI - PMC - PubMed