Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Apr;89(4):644-51.
doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000193.

Assessing the effects of the 2003 resident duty hours reform on internal medicine board scores

Affiliations

Assessing the effects of the 2003 resident duty hours reform on internal medicine board scores

Jeffrey H Silber et al. Acad Med. 2014 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether the 2003 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) duty hours reform affected medical knowledge as reflected by written board scores for internal medicine (IM) residents.

Method: The authors conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of postgraduate year 1 (PGY-1) Internal Medicine residents who started training before and after the 2003 duty hour reform using a merged data set of American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) Board examination and the National Board of Medical Examiners (NMBE) United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 2 Clinical Knowledge test scores. Specifically, using four regression models, the authors compared IM residents beginning PGY-1 training in 2000 and completing training unexposed to the 2003 duty hours reform (PGY-1 2000 cohort, n = 5,475) to PGY-1 cohorts starting in 2001 through 2005 (n = 28,008), all with some exposure to the reform.

Results: The mean ABIM board score for the unexposed PGY-1 2000 cohort (n = 5,475) was 491, SD = 85. Adjusting for demographics, program, and USMLE Step 2 exam score, the mean differences (95% CI) in ABIM board scores between the PGY-1 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005 cohorts minus the PGY-1 2000 cohort were -5.43 (-7.63, -3.23), -3.44 (-5.65, -1.24), 2.58 (0.36, 4.79), 11.10 (8.88, 13.33) and 11.28 (8.98, 13.58) points respectively. None of these differences exceeded one-fifth of an SD in ABIM board scores.

Conclusions: The duty hours reforms of 2003 did not meaningfully affect medical knowledge as measured by scores on the ABIM board examinations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Other disclosures: None reported.

References

    1. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Resident Duty Hours in the Learning and Working Environment. http://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/Portals/0/PDFs/dh-ComparisonTable2003v2011.... Accessed December 17, 2013.
    1. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. The ACGME’s Approach to Limit Resident Duty Hours 12 Months After Implementation: A Summary of Achievements, 2004. Report of the Work Group on Resident Duty Hours and the Learning Environment. June 11, 2002. http://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/Portals/0/PFAssets/PublicationsPapers/dh_d.... Accessed December 6, 2013.
    1. Volpp KG, Rosen AK, Rosenbaum PR, et al. Mortality among hospitalized Medicare beneficiaries in the first 2 years following ACGME resident duty hour reform. JAMA. 2007;298:975–983. - PubMed
    1. Volpp KG, Rosen AK, Rosenbaum PR, et al. Mortality among patients in VA hospitals in the first 2 years following ACGME resident duty hour reform. JAMA. 2007;298:984–992. - PubMed
    1. Fletcher KE, Reed DA, Arora VM. Patient safety, resident education and resident well-being following implementation of the 2003 ACGME duty hour rules. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26:907–919. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types