Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 May;53(2):241-54.
doi: 10.1007/s00411-014-0519-8. Epub 2014 Feb 21.

Web-based scoring of the dicentric assay, a collaborative biodosimetric scoring strategy for population triage in large scale radiation accidents

Affiliations

Web-based scoring of the dicentric assay, a collaborative biodosimetric scoring strategy for population triage in large scale radiation accidents

H Romm et al. Radiat Environ Biophys. 2014 May.

Abstract

In the case of a large scale radiation accident high throughput methods of biological dosimetry for population triage are needed to identify individuals requiring clinical treatment. The dicentric assay performed in web-based scoring mode may be a very suitable technique. Within the MULTIBIODOSE EU FP7 project a network is being established of 8 laboratories with expertise in dose estimations based on the dicentric assay. Here, the manual dicentric assay was tested in a web-based scoring mode. More than 23,000 high resolution images of metaphase spreads (only first mitosis) were captured by four laboratories and established as image galleries on the internet (cloud). The galleries included images of a complete dose effect curve (0-5.0 Gy) and three types of irradiation scenarios simulating acute whole body, partial body and protracted exposure. The blood samples had been irradiated in vitro with gamma rays at the University of Ghent, Belgium. Two laboratories provided image galleries from Fluorescence plus Giemsa stained slides (3 h colcemid) and the image galleries from the other two laboratories contained images from Giemsa stained preparations (24 h colcemid). Each of the 8 participating laboratories analysed 3 dose points of the dose effect curve (scoring 100 cells for each point) and 3 unknown dose points (50 cells) for each of the 3 simulated irradiation scenarios. At first all analyses were performed in a QuickScan Mode without scoring individual chromosomes, followed by conventional scoring (only complete cells, 46 centromeres). The calibration curves obtained using these two scoring methods were very similar, with no significant difference in the linear-quadratic curve coefficients. Analysis of variance showed a significant effect of dose on the yield of dicentrics, but no significant effect of the laboratories, different methods of slide preparation or different incubation times used for colcemid. The results obtained to date within the MULTIBIODOSE project by a network of 8 collaborating laboratories throughout Europe are very promising. The dicentric assay in the web based scoring mode as a high throughput scoring strategy is a useful application for biodosimetry in the case of a large scale radiation accident.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

  • Automatic scoring of dicentric chromosomes as a tool in large scale radiation accidents.
    Romm H, Ainsbury E, Barnard S, Barrios L, Barquinero JF, Beinke C, Deperas M, Gregoire E, Koivistoinen A, Lindholm C, Moquet J, Oestreicher U, Puig R, Rothkamm K, Sommer S, Thierens H, Vandersickel V, Vral A, Wojcik A. Romm H, et al. Mutat Res. 2013 Aug 30;756(1-2):174-83. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2013.05.013. Epub 2013 May 23. Mutat Res. 2013. PMID: 23707243
  • Validation of semi-automatic scoring of dicentric chromosomes after simulation of three different irradiation scenarios.
    Romm H, Ainsbury E, Barnard S, Barrios L, Barquinero JF, Beinke C, Deperas M, Gregoire E, Koivistoinen A, Lindholm C, Moquet J, Oestreicher U, Puig R, Rothkamm K, Sommer S, Thierens H, Vandersickel V, Vral A, Wojcik A. Romm H, et al. Health Phys. 2014 Jun;106(6):764-71. doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000000077. Health Phys. 2014. PMID: 24776911
  • RENEB Inter-Laboratory Comparison 2021: The Dicentric Chromosome Assay.
    Endesfelder D, Oestreicher U, Bucher M, Beinke C, Siebenwirth C, Ainsbury E, Moquet J, Gruel G, Gregoire E, Martinez JS, Vral A, Baeyens A, Valente M, Montoro A, Terzoudi G, Triantopoulou S, Pantelias A, Monteiro Gil O, Prieto MJ, Domene MM, Zafiropoulos D, Barquinero JF, Pujol-Canadell M, Lumniczky K, Hargitai R, Kis E, Testa A, Patrono C, Sommer S, Hristova R, Kostova N, Atanasova M, Sevriukova O, Domínguez I, Pastor N, Güçlü I, Pajic J, Sabatier L, Brochard P, Tichy A, Milanova M, Finot F, Cuceu Petrenci C, Wilkins RC, Beaton-Green LA, Seong KM, Lee Y, Lee YH, Balajee AS, Maznyk N, Sypko T, Pham ND, Tran TM, Miura T, Suto Y, Akiyamam M, Tsuyama N, Abe Y, Goh VST, Chua CEL, Abend M, Port M. Endesfelder D, et al. Radiat Res. 2023 Jun 1;199(6):556-570. doi: 10.1667/RADE-22-00202.1. Radiat Res. 2023. PMID: 37018160
  • Operational guidance for radiation emergency response organisations in Europe for using biodosimetric tools developed in EU MULTIBIODOSE project.
    Jaworska A, Ainsbury EA, Fattibene P, Lindholm C, Oestreicher U, Rothkamm K, Romm H, Thierens H, Trompier F, Voisin P, Vral A, Woda C, Wojcik A. Jaworska A, et al. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2015 Apr;164(1-2):165-9. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncu294. Epub 2014 Oct 1. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2015. PMID: 25274532 Review.
  • Cytogenetic biodosimetry: what it is and how we do it.
    Wong KF, Siu LL, Ainsbury E, Moquet J. Wong KF, et al. Hong Kong Med J. 2013 Apr;19(2):168-73. Hong Kong Med J. 2013. PMID: 23535678 Review.

Cited by

References

    1. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2010 Mar;138(4):397-401 - PubMed
    1. Radiat Res. 2009 May;171(5):541-8 - PubMed
    1. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2012 Oct;151(4):621-5 - PubMed
    1. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2012 Oct;151(4):611-20 - PubMed
    1. Health Phys. 2010 Jun;98(6):779-83 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources