Predictive value of updating Framingham risk scores with novel risk markers in the U.S. general population
- PMID: 24558385
- PMCID: PMC3928195
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088312
Predictive value of updating Framingham risk scores with novel risk markers in the U.S. general population
Abstract
Background: According to population-based cohort studies CT coronary calcium score (CTCS), carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT), high-sensitivity C- reactive protein (CRP), and ankle-brachial index (ABI) are promising novel risk markers for improving cardiovascular risk assessment. Their impact in the U.S. general population is however uncertain. Our aim was to estimate the predictive value of four novel cardiovascular risk markers for the U.S. general population.
Methods and findings: Risk profiles, CRP and ABI data of 3,736 asymptomatic subjects aged 40 or older from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2003-2004 exam were used along with predicted CTCS and cIMT values. For each subject, we calculated 10-year cardiovascular risks with and without each risk marker. Event rates adjusted for competing risks were obtained by microsimulation. We assessed the impact of updated 10-year risk scores by reclassification and C-statistics. In the study population (mean age 56±11 years, 48% male), 70% (80%) were at low (<10%), 19% (14%) at intermediate (≥10-<20%), and 11% (6%) at high (≥20%) 10-year CVD (CHD) risk. Net reclassification improvement was highest after updating 10-year CVD risk with CTCS: 0.10 (95%CI 0.02-0.19). The C-statistic for 10-year CVD risk increased from 0.82 by 0.02 (95%CI 0.01-0.03) with CTCS. Reclassification occurred most often in those at intermediate risk: with CTCS, 36% (38%) moved to low and 22% (30%) to high CVD (CHD) risk. Improvements with other novel risk markers were limited.
Conclusions: Only CTCS appeared to have significant incremental predictive value in the U.S. general population, especially in those at intermediate risk. In future research, cost-effectiveness analyses should be considered for evaluating novel cardiovascular risk assessment strategies.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures

Similar articles
-
Comparison of novel risk markers for improvement in cardiovascular risk assessment in intermediate-risk individuals.JAMA. 2012 Aug 22;308(8):788-95. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.9624. JAMA. 2012. PMID: 22910756 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing the cost-effectiveness of four novel risk markers for screening asymptomatic individuals to prevent cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the US population.Int J Cardiol. 2016 Jan 15;203:422-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.10.171. Epub 2015 Oct 21. Int J Cardiol. 2016. PMID: 26547049
-
Comparison of coronary artery calcification, carotid intima-media thickness and ankle-brachial index for predicting 10-year incident cardiovascular events in the general population.Eur Heart J. 2017 Jun 14;38(23):1815-1822. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx120. Eur Heart J. 2017. PMID: 28379333
-
The value of carotid intima-media thickness for predicting cardiovascular risk.Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2010 Feb;30(2):182-5. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.109.196980. Epub 2009 Nov 30. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2010. PMID: 19948842 Review.
-
The role of ankle brachial index and carotid intima-media thickness in vascular risk stratification.Curr Opin Cardiol. 2010 Jul;25(4):394-8. doi: 10.1097/hco.0b013e328338c109. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2010. PMID: 20549844 Review.
Cited by
-
Heterogeneity in coronary heart disease risk.Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 16;12(1):10131. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14013-3. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 35710917 Free PMC article.
-
Associations Between Systolic Interarm Differences in Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes and Mortality: Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis, Development and Validation of a Prognostic Algorithm: The INTERPRESS-IPD Collaboration.Hypertension. 2021 Feb;77(2):650-661. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15997. Epub 2020 Dec 21. Hypertension. 2021. PMID: 33342236 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring the Subclinical Atherosclerotic Load in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Cross-Sectional Study.Cureus. 2022 Dec 17;14(12):e32644. doi: 10.7759/cureus.32644. eCollection 2022 Dec. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 36654631 Free PMC article.
-
A Machine Learning-Based Applied Prediction Model for Identification of Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) Outcomes and Mortality in Patients during the Hospital Stay.Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jan 25;23(3):1351. doi: 10.3390/s23031351. Sensors (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36772390 Free PMC article.
-
Cohort profile: the Emory Cardiovascular Biobank (EmCAB).BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 29;7(12):e018753. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018753. BMJ Open. 2017. PMID: 29288185 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Merz CN, Brewer HB Jr, Clark LT, et al. (2004) Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. Circulation 110: 227–239. - PubMed
-
- D'Agostino RB Sr, Vasan RS, Pencina MJ, Wolf PA, Cobain M, et al. (2008) General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 117: 743–753. - PubMed
-
- Wilson PW, D'Agostino RB, Levy D, Belanger AM, Silbershatz H, et al. (1998) Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. Circulation 97: 1837–1847. - PubMed
-
- U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2009) Using nontraditional risk factors in coronary heart disease risk assessment: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 151: 474–482. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Molecular Biology Databases
Research Materials
Miscellaneous