Effects of N-acetylprocainamide and recainam in the pharmacologic conversion and suppression of experimental canine atrial flutter: significance of changes in refractoriness and conduction
- PMID: 2455844
- DOI: 10.1097/00005344-198805000-00010
Effects of N-acetylprocainamide and recainam in the pharmacologic conversion and suppression of experimental canine atrial flutter: significance of changes in refractoriness and conduction
Abstract
The electrophysiologic determinants of the pharmacologic conversion and the prevention of atrial flutter are poorly defined. This study investigated the effects of pharmacologically induced changes in atrial conduction velocity and refractoriness, in the conversion and suppression of atrial flutter induced in the open-chest anesthetized dog by intercaval crush and rapid atrial pacing. The effects of an intravenous infusion of the new class III antiarrhythmic drug N-acetylprocainamide (30 mg/kg over 15 min) and the class Ic antiarrhythmic drug recainam (10 mg/kg over 20 min followed by 10 mg/kg/h) were evaluated. N-acetylprocainamide restored sinus rhythm in 10 of 15 (66%) dogs, while recainam converted only 2 of 10 (20%). N-acetylprocainamide prevented reinduction in 3 (20%), while recainam was effective in none. In the atria, N-acetylprocainamide induced significant increases in effective refractory period (+27%, p less than 0.01), functional refractory period (+22%, p less than 0.01), and in atrial flutter cycle length (+13%, p less than 0.01). Recainam increased effective refractory period (+28%, p less than 0.01), functional refractory period (+20%, p less than 0.01), conduction time at atrial paced cycle length of 150 msec (+70%, p less than 0.01) and atrial flutter cycle length (+56%, p less than 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Similar articles
-
Pharmacologic conversion and suppression of experimental canine atrial flutter: differing effects of d-sotalol, quinidine, and lidocaine and significance of changes in refractoriness and conduction.Circulation. 1986 Jul;74(1):197-204. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.74.1.197. Circulation. 1986. PMID: 3708774
-
Effects of N-acetylprocainamide on experimental atrial flutter and atrial electrophysiologic properties in conscious dogs with sterile pericarditis: comparison with the effects of quinidine.J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987 Jun;9(6):1332-8. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(87)80474-6. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987. PMID: 2438320
-
Clinical electrophysiological effects of intravenous recainam: an antiarrhythmic drug under investigation for the treatment of ventricular and supraventricular arrhythmias.Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1991 Jul;14(7):1129-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1991.tb02844.x. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1991. PMID: 1715550 Clinical Trial.
-
Mechanisms of antiarrhythmic drug action on termination of atrial flutter.Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2001 May;24(5):824-34. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2001.00824.x. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2001. PMID: 11388102 Review.
-
Dofetilide versus quinidine for atrial flutter: viva la difference!?J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1996 Sep;7(9):828-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.1996.tb00595.x. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1996. PMID: 8884511 Review.
Cited by
-
Oral N-acetylprocainamide compared to quinidine plus digoxin in the chronic suppression of atrial flutter in humans.Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1989 Apr;3(2):191-8. doi: 10.1007/BF01883864. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1989. PMID: 2484856 Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources