Ethica ex machina: issues in roboethics
- PMID: 24558732
- DOI: 10.3917/jib.243.0015
Ethica ex machina: issues in roboethics
Abstract
Is "roboethics" the "ethics of humans" or the "ethics of robots"? According to the Roboethics Roadmap (Gianmarco Veruggio), it is the human ethics of robot designers, manufacturers, and users. And ifroboethics roots deeply in society, artificial ethics (ethics of robots) might be put on the agenda some day. At the 1st International Symposium on Roboethics in San Remo, Ronald C. Arkin gave the presentation "Bombs, Bonding, and Bondage: Human-Robot Interaction and Related Ethical Issues" (2004). "Bondage" is the issue of enslavement and possible rebellion of robots. "Bombs" is the issue of military use of robots. And "bonding" is the issue of affective, emotional attachment of humans to robots. I contrast two extreme attitudes towards the issue of "bonding" and propose a middle ground. "Anthropomorphism" has two meanings. First, it means "human-shaped-ness." Second, it means "attribution of human characteristics or feelings to a nonhuman being (god, animal, or object)" (personification, empathy). Some say that Japanese (or East Asians) hold "animism," which makes it easy for them to treat robots like animated beings (to anthropomorphize robots); hence "Robot Kingdom Japan." Cosima Wagner criticizes such exaggeration and oversimplification as "invented tradition". I reinforce her argument with neuroscientific findings and argue that such "animism" is neither Shintoistic nor Buddhistic, but a universal tendency. Roboticists, especially Japanese roboticists emphasize that robotics is "anthropology." It is true that through the construction of humanoid robots we can better understand human beings (so-called "constructive approach"). But at the same time, we must not forget that robotic technology, like any other technology, changes our way of living and being--deeply: it can bring about our ontological transformation. In this sense, the governance of robotic technology is "governed governance." The interdisciplinary research area of technology assessment studies (TAS) will gain much importance. And we should always be ready to rethink the direction of the research and development of robotic technology, bearing the desirable future of human society in mind.
Similar articles
-
Human-Robot Confluence: Toward a Humane Robotics.Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2021 May;24(5):291-293. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2021.29215.gri. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2021. PMID: 34003012
-
Anthropomorphism in Human-Robot Co-evolution.Front Psychol. 2018 Mar 26;9:468. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00468. eCollection 2018. Front Psychol. 2018. PMID: 29632507 Free PMC article.
-
"Involving interface": an extended mind theoretical approach to roboethics.Account Res. 2010 Nov;17(6):316-29. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2010.524082. Account Res. 2010. PMID: 21069594
-
Roboethics principles and policies in Europe and North America.SN Appl Sci. 2021;3(12):857. doi: 10.1007/s42452-021-04853-5. Epub 2021 Nov 7. SN Appl Sci. 2021. PMID: 34790889 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Nursing and Rehabilitative Care of the Elderly Using Humanoid Robots.J Med Invest. 2019;66(1.2):19-23. doi: 10.2152/jmi.66.19. J Med Invest. 2019. PMID: 31064938 Review.
Cited by
-
ROBOTIC SURGERY: BIOETHICAL ASPECTS.Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2016 Nov-Dec;29(4):287-290. doi: 10.1590/0102-6720201600040018. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2016. PMID: 28076489 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Other Literature Sources