Patterns of care, predictors, and outcomes of chemotherapy in elderly women with early-stage uterine carcinosarcoma: a population-based analysis
- PMID: 24561247
- PMCID: PMC4501483
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.02.021
Patterns of care, predictors, and outcomes of chemotherapy in elderly women with early-stage uterine carcinosarcoma: a population-based analysis
Abstract
Objective: To examine the patterns of care, predictors, and impact of chemotherapy on survival in elderly women diagnosed with early-stage uterine carcinosarcoma.
Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database was used to identify women 65 years or older diagnosed with stage I-II uterine carcinosarcomas from 1991 through 2007. Multivariable logistic regression and Cox-proportional hazards models were used for statistical analysis.
Results: A total of 462 women met the eligibility criteria; 374 had stage I, and 88 had stage II uterine carcinosarcomas. There were no appreciable differences over time in the percentages of women administered chemotherapy for early stage uterine carcinosarcoma (14.7% in 1991-1995, 14.9% in 1996-2000, and 17.9% in 2001-2007, P=0.67). On multivariable analysis, the factors positively associated with receipt of chemotherapy were younger age at diagnosis, higher disease stage, residence in the eastern part of the United States, and lack of administration of external beam radiation (P<0.05). In the adjusted Cox-proportional hazards regression models, administration of three or more cycles of chemotherapy did not reduce the risk of death in stage I patients (HR: 1.45, 95% CI: 0.83-2.39) but was associated with non-significant decreased mortality in stage II patients (HR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.32-1.95).
Conclusions: Approximately 15-18% of elderly patients diagnosed with early-stage uterine carcinosarcoma were treated with chemotherapy. This trend remained stable over time, and chemotherapy was not associated with any significant survival benefit in this patient population.
Keywords: Carcinosarcoma; Chemotherapy; Outcomes; Patterns of care.
Published by Elsevier Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Review of Recommended Treatment of Uterine Carcinosarcoma.Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2015 Nov;16(11):53. doi: 10.1007/s11864-015-0370-4. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2015. PMID: 26374341 Review.
-
Stage I uterine carcinosarcoma: Matched cohort analyses for lymphadenectomy, chemotherapy, and brachytherapy.Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Apr;145(1):71-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.01.010. Epub 2017 Mar 15. Gynecol Oncol. 2017. PMID: 28317560
-
Improved survival with combination chemotherapy and external beam radiation therapy in uterine carcinosarcoma.Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2022 Nov 7;32(11):1402-1409. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-003717. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2022. PMID: 36343971
-
Impact of adjuvant therapy on recurrence patterns in stage I uterine carcinosarcoma.Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Apr;145(1):78-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.02.001. Epub 2017 Feb 16. Gynecol Oncol. 2017. PMID: 28215838 Free PMC article.
-
[Uterine carcinosarcoma].Ginekol Pol. 2012 Aug;83(8):609-12. Ginekol Pol. 2012. PMID: 23342885 Review. Polish.
Cited by
-
Gynecologic cancer outcomes in the elderly poor: A population-based study.Cancer. 2015 Oct 15;121(20):3591-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29541. Epub 2015 Jul 31. Cancer. 2015. PMID: 26230631 Free PMC article.
-
Review of Recommended Treatment of Uterine Carcinosarcoma.Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2015 Nov;16(11):53. doi: 10.1007/s11864-015-0370-4. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2015. PMID: 26374341 Review.
-
Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Ratio in Patients with Uterine Carcinosarcoma.J Pers Med. 2024 Jan 30;14(2):155. doi: 10.3390/jpm14020155. J Pers Med. 2024. PMID: 38392588 Free PMC article.
-
Carcinosarcomas of the Uterus: Prognostic Factors and Impact of Adjuvant Treatment.Cancer Manag Res. 2021 Jun 10;13:4633-4645. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S309551. eCollection 2021. Cancer Manag Res. 2021. PMID: 34140809 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of Adjuvant Therapy on Oncologic Outcomes of Surgically Confirmed Stage I Uterine Carcinosarcoma: a Turkish Gynecologic Oncology Study.Balkan Med J. 2019 Jul 11;36(4):229-234. doi: 10.4274/balkanmedj.galenos.2019.2018.12.75. Epub 2019 Mar 15. Balkan Med J. 2019. PMID: 30873825 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013;63:11–30. - PubMed
-
- Prat J. FIGO staging for uterine sarcomas. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;104:177–8. - PubMed
-
- Bansal N, Herzog TJ, Seshan VE, Schiff PB, Burke WM, Cohen CJ, et al. Uterine carcinosarcomas and grade 3 endometrioid cancers: evidence for distinct tumor behavior. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112:64–70. - PubMed
-
- Nielsen SN, Podratz KC, Scheithauer BW, O'Brien PC. Clinicopathologic analysis of uterine malignant mixed mullerian tumors. Gynecol Oncol. 1989;34:372–8. - PubMed
-
- Leath CA, 3rd, Numnum TM, Kendrick JEt, Frederick PJ, Rocconi RP, Conner MG, et al. Patterns of failure for conservatively managed surgical stage I uterine carcinosarcoma: implications for adjuvant therapy. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009;19:888–91. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous