Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Feb 21;4(2):e003968.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003968.

The routine collection of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for long-term conditions in primary care: a cohort survey

Affiliations

The routine collection of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for long-term conditions in primary care: a cohort survey

Michele Peters et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility of using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for long-term conditions (LTCs) in primary care.

Design: A cohort postal survey conducted from September 2010 to April 2012.

Setting: Primary care practices (n=33) in London and the North-West of England.

Participants: 4484 patients with a diagnosis of asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, epilepsy, heart failure or stroke were sent a survey at baseline.

Main outcome: The main outcome was to evaluate the feasibility of and the recruitment strategies for collecting PROMs data in LTCs by assessing the response rates for the baseline and follow-up surveys. Secondary outcomes were the evaluation of change scores of the EQ-5D index and visual analogue scale (VAS) between baseline and follow-up surveys.

Results: The baseline survey achieved a response rate of 38.4% (n=1721/4485) and at follow-up 71.5% (n=1136/1589). Response rates varied by LTC. Little change was found in health-related quality of life for the total sample (-0.001 for the EQ-5D index score and 0.12 for the EQ-5D VAS) between patients responding to both the baseline and follow-up surveys.

Conclusions: The response rate to the baseline survey was similar to that of other general practice surveys. Current UK policy aims to assess health service performance in LTCs by means of using PROMs. It thus would be desirable to improve response rates by making the invitation to self-reports of health-related quality of life more engaging for patients. Results on the EQ-5D score raise questions about optimal indicators for LTCs and appropriate timelines for assessment.

Keywords: Cohort study; Long-term conditions; PRIMARY CARE; Patient-reported outcome measures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Recruitment and participation (n) of people with long-term conditions (LTCs).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Barnett K, Mercer SW, Norbury M, et al. Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for healthcare, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study. Lancet 2012;380:37–43 - PubMed
    1. Department of Health Long term conditions compendium of information. 3rd edn London: Department of Health, 2012
    1. Vogeli C, Shields AE, Lee TA, et al. Multiple chronic conditions: prevalence, health consequences, and implications for quality, care management, and costs. J Gen Intern Med 2007;22(Suppl 3):391–5 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pearson WS, Bhat-Schelbert K, Probst JC. Multiple chronic conditions and the aging of America: a challenge for primary care physicians. J Prim Care Community Health 2012;3:51–6 - PubMed
    1. Anderson G, Horvath J. The growing burden of chronic disease in America. Public Health Rep 2004;119:263–70 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types