Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2014 Oct;46(10):2014-24.
doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000314.

Validity of 24-h physical activity recall: physical activity measurement survey

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Validity of 24-h physical activity recall: physical activity measurement survey

Gregory J Welk et al. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity of an interviewer-administered, 24-h physical activity recall (PAR) compared with that of the SenseWear Armband (SWA) for estimation of energy expenditure (EE) and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) in a representative sample of adults. A secondary goal was to compare measurement errors for various demographic subgroups (gender, age, and weight status).

Methods: A sample of 1347 adults (20-71 yr, 786 females) wore an SWA for a single day and then completed a PAR, recalling the previous day's physical activity. The participants each performed two trials on two randomly selected days across a 2-yr time span. The EE and MVPA values for each participant were averaged across the 2 d. Group-level and individual-level agreement were evaluated using 95% equivalence testing and mean absolute percent error, respectively. Results were further examined for subgroups by gender, age, and body mass index.

Results: The PAR yielded equivalent estimates of EE (compared with those in the SWA) for almost all demographic subgroups, but none of the comparisons for MVPA were equivalent. Smaller mean absolute percent error values were observed for EE (ranges from 10.3% to 15.0%) than those for MVPA (ranges from 68.6% to 269.5%) across all comparisons. The PAR yielded underestimates of MVPA for younger, less obese people but overestimates for older, more obese people.

Conclusions: For EE measurement, the PAR demonstrated good agreement relative to the SWA. However, the use of PAR may result in biased estimates of MVPA both at the group and individual level in adults.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All the authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Results from 95% equivalence testing for agreement between 24-h physical activity recall (PAR) and SenseWear Armband (SWA) for energy expenditure (left) and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (right).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Bland-Altman plots with 95% limits of agreement between 24-h physical activity recall (PAR) and SenseWear Armband (SWA) for energy expenditure (left) and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (right).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Heat maps from 3 way ANOVA test – gender × age × body mass index (BMI) – for energy expenditure (top) and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (bottom). White indicates values from SenseWear Armband (SWA) and 24-hour physical activity recall (PAR) are the same on average; Blue indicates values from PAR are smaller than SWA; Red indicates values from PAR larger than SWA.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adams SA, Matthews CE, Ebbeling CB, et al. The effect of social desirability and social approval on self-reports of physical activity. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;161(4):389–398. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ainsworth BE, Caspersen CJ, Matthews CE, Masse LC, Baranowski T, Zhu W. Recommendations to improve the accuracy of estimates of physical activity derived from self report. J Phys Act Health. 2012;9(Suppl 1):S76–S84. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Herrmann SD, et al. 2011 Compendium of Physical Activities: a second update of codes and MET values. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(8):1575–1581. - PubMed
    1. Berntsen S, Hageberg R, Aandstad A, et al. Validity of physical activity monitors in adults participating in free-living activities. Br J Sports Med. 2010;44(9):657–664. - PubMed
    1. Bland JM, Altman DG. Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading. Lancet. 1995;346(8982):1085–1087. - PubMed

Publication types