Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Sep;45(3):291-7.
doi: 10.1007/s12029-014-9586-y.

Role of pelvic exenteration in the management of locally advanced primary and recurrent rectal cancer

Affiliations

Role of pelvic exenteration in the management of locally advanced primary and recurrent rectal cancer

Koh Ye Xin et al. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2014 Sep.

Abstract

Aim: A review of a single-centre experience of pelvic exenteration as a treatment modality for patients with locally advanced primary and recurrent rectal cancer. The perioperative outcomes, morbidity and long term oncological outcomes are reviewed.

Materials & methods: Patients undergoing pelvic exenterations for recurrent and locally advanced rectal cancer between 1 January 2006 and 1 August 2012 were identified from a prospective database. All patients underwent pre-operative staging investigations with computed tomography (CT) scan of chest, abdomen and pelvis and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Patients with locally advanced primary rectal cancer were counselled for pre-operative chemoradiation. Structures such as the urinary bladder and female reproductive organs were resected en bloc where indicated with the lesion. Urological or plastic reconstructions were employed where indicated. The primary outcome measured was overall survival and secondary outcomes measured were time to local recurrence (LR) and systemic recurrence. Disease-free survival was examined by the Kaplan-Meier Method (Fig. 1).

Results: Pelvic exenterations were performed in 13 patients with a median age of 59 (range 26-81). The rate of major post-operative complications was 8% (n = 1), where the patient had anastomotic leakage. There were no mortalities in the perioperative period. All patients were operated with curative intent and negative circumferential margins were shown in 9 out of 13 patients (70%). The DFS was 19.4 and the OS was 22.5 months.

Conclusion: An aggressive approach with en bloc resection of organs involved provides survival benefit to patients with locally advanced primary and recurrent rectal cancer with an acceptable morbidity profile.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jan 10;28(2):256-63 - PubMed
    1. Surgery. 1993 Apr;113(4):365-72 - PubMed
    1. Br J Surg. 2011 Apr;98(4):582-8 - PubMed
    1. Curr Probl Surg. 1986 Dec;23(12):869-953 - PubMed
    1. Arch Surg. 1987 May;122(5):537-41 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources