Sensitivity to Phonological Universals: The Case of Stops and Fricatives
- PMID: 24563326
- DOI: 10.1007/s10936-014-9289-3
Sensitivity to Phonological Universals: The Case of Stops and Fricatives
Abstract
Linguistic evidence suggests that syllables like bdam (with stop-stop clusters) are less preferred than bzam (with stop-fricative combinations). Here, we demonstrate that English speakers manifest similar preferences despite no direct experience with either structure. Experiment 1 elicited syllable count for auditory materials (e.g., does bzam have one syllable or two?); Experiment 2 examined the AX discrimination of auditory stimuli (e.g., is bzam = bezam?); whereas Experiment 3 repeated this task using printed materials. Results showed that syllables that are dispreferred across languages (e.g., bdam) were prone to misidentification relative to preferred syllables (e.g., bzam). The emergence of this pattern irrespective of stimulus modality--for auditory and printed materials--suggests that misidentification does not solely stem from a phonetic failure. Further, the effect remained significant after controlling for various statistical properties of the materials. These results suggest that speakers possess broad linguistic preferences that extend to syllables they have never encountered before.
Similar articles
-
Universal Restrictions on Syllable Structure: Evidence From Mandarin Chinese.J Psycholinguist Res. 2016 Aug;45(4):795-811. doi: 10.1007/s10936-015-9375-1. J Psycholinguist Res. 2016. PMID: 25980969
-
The Basis of the Syllable Hierarchy: Articulatory Pressures or Universal Phonological Constraints?J Psycholinguist Res. 2018 Feb;47(1):29-64. doi: 10.1007/s10936-017-9510-2. J Psycholinguist Res. 2018. PMID: 28710697
-
The nature of the phonological processing in French dyslexic children: evidence for the phonological syllable and linguistic features' role in silent reading and speech discrimination.Ann Dyslexia. 2010 Dec;60(2):123-50. doi: 10.1007/s11881-010-0036-7. Epub 2010 Jun 9. Ann Dyslexia. 2010. PMID: 20533097
-
The relation between phonetics and phonology.Phonetica. 1991;48(2-4):108-19. doi: 10.1159/000261879. Phonetica. 1991. PMID: 1800994 Review.
-
Perceptual processing of Mandarin nasals by L1 and L2 Mandarin speakers.J Psycholinguist Res. 2012 Aug;41(4):237-52. doi: 10.1007/s10936-011-9190-2. J Psycholinguist Res. 2012. PMID: 22089521 Review.
Cited by
-
Commentary: "An Evaluation of Universal Grammar and the Phonological Mind"-UG Is Still a Viable Hypothesis.Front Psychol. 2016 Jul 14;7:1029. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01029. eCollection 2016. Front Psychol. 2016. PMID: 27471480 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Frequency of use and sonority sequencing in first- and second-language consonant cluster perception: facilitation is language-specific.Front Psychol. 2025 Aug 18;16:1483046. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1483046. eCollection 2025. Front Psychol. 2025. PMID: 40900955 Free PMC article.
-
Universal Restrictions on Syllable Structure: Evidence From Mandarin Chinese.J Psycholinguist Res. 2016 Aug;45(4):795-811. doi: 10.1007/s10936-015-9375-1. J Psycholinguist Res. 2016. PMID: 25980969
-
Universal Restrictions in Reading: What Do French Beginning Readers (Mis)perceive?Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 14;10:2914. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02914. eCollection 2019. Front Psychol. 2020. PMID: 32010015 Free PMC article.
-
The Basis of the Syllable Hierarchy: Articulatory Pressures or Universal Phonological Constraints?J Psycholinguist Res. 2018 Feb;47(1):29-64. doi: 10.1007/s10936-017-9510-2. J Psycholinguist Res. 2018. PMID: 28710697
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources