Difficulties of motion-onset VEP interpretation in school-age children
- PMID: 24563372
- DOI: 10.1007/s10633-014-9429-y
Difficulties of motion-onset VEP interpretation in school-age children
Abstract
Background: In adults, motion-onset visual evoked potentials (M-VEPs) with a dominant N2 peak represent a useful diagnostic tool. However, it is difficult to use this type of VEP in children because of the long maturation (up to 18 years) of M-VEPs, which is characterised by a gradual decrease in N2 peak latency and shape development. Moreover, in some children, M-VEPs are difficult to identify with standard stimuli.
Methods: We tested features of M-VEPs in 30 children (7-12 years) with the following set of standard stimuli used in our lab for examining adults ( https://web.lfhk.cuni.cz/elf ): low-contrast translation motion (TM) and expansion/contraction motion (ExCoM) in full field and in periphery (with central 20° masked). In 16 children, a high-contrast TM was also tested.
Results: With standard (low-contrast) stimuli, a common M-VEP to TM and to ExCoM was detected in 77 and 83 % of children, respectively. The M-VEPs to ExCoM in the periphery were detected in only 43 % of children. An abnormal dominant P1 peak was found in 9 % of VEPs to TM, 12 % of VEPs to full-field ExCoM and 14 % of VEPs to peripheral ExCoM. The M-VEPs to all low-contrast stimuli displayed large inter-individual latency variability (N2 peak latency differed for more than 100 ms). High contrast (more suitable for the non-mature magnocellular pathway) shortened M-VEP latencies and improved amplitudes.
Conclusions: Our findings show that the maturation of motion perception in children is inter-individually variable, which limits the diagnostic use of M-VEPs.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of visual information processing in school-age dyslexics and normal readers via motion-onset visual evoked potentials.Vision Res. 2015 Jun;111(Pt A):97-104. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.03.027. Epub 2015 Apr 22. Vision Res. 2015. PMID: 25913026
-
Contrast dependence of motion-onset and pattern-reversal evoked potentials.Vision Res. 1995 Jan;35(2):197-205. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)00138-c. Vision Res. 1995. PMID: 7839616
-
Is the motion system relatively spared in amblyopia? Evidence from cortical evoked responses.Vision Res. 1996 Jan;36(1):181-90. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00055-5. Vision Res. 1996. PMID: 8746252
-
Motion-onset VEPs: characteristics, methods, and diagnostic use.Vision Res. 2007 Jan;47(2):189-202. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.09.020. Epub 2006 Nov 28. Vision Res. 2007. PMID: 17129593 Review.
-
A primer on motion visual evoked potentials.Doc Ophthalmol. 2007 Mar;114(2):83-105. doi: 10.1007/s10633-006-9043-8. Epub 2007 Feb 16. Doc Ophthalmol. 2007. PMID: 17431818 Review.
Cited by
-
Neural dynamics underlying coherent motion perception in children and adults.Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2019 Aug;38:100670. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2019.100670. Epub 2019 Jun 13. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2019. PMID: 31228678 Free PMC article.
-
Distinct Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns for Apparent Motion Processing in School-Aged Children.Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Jun 28;10:277. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00277. eCollection 2016. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016. PMID: 27445738 Free PMC article.
-
Visual Cross-Modal Re-Organization in Children with Cochlear Implants.PLoS One. 2016 Jan 25;11(1):e0147793. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147793. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 26807850 Free PMC article.
-
Global motion evoked potentials in autistic and dyslexic children: A cross-syndrome approach.Cortex. 2021 Oct;143:109-126. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2021.06.018. Epub 2021 Jul 28. Cortex. 2021. PMID: 34399308 Free PMC article.
-
Steady-State Pattern Electroretinogram and Frequency Doubling Technology in Adult Dyslexic Readers.Clin Ophthalmol. 2019 Dec 11;13:2451-2459. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S229898. eCollection 2019. Clin Ophthalmol. 2019. PMID: 31849443 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous