Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Mar;106(3):dju009.
doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju009. Epub 2014 Feb 22.

Effect of VIA screening by primary health workers: randomized controlled study in Mumbai, India

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of VIA screening by primary health workers: randomized controlled study in Mumbai, India

Surendra S Shastri et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Mar.

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: Cervical cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality among women in India. Because Pap smear screening is not feasible in India, we need to develop effective alternatives.

Methods: A cluster-randomized controlled study was initiated in 1998 in Mumbai, India, to investigate the efficacy of visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) performed by primary health workers in reducing cervical cancer mortality. Four rounds of cancer education and VIA screening were conducted at 24-month intervals in the screening group, whereas cancer education was offered once at entry to the control group. The study was planned for 16 years to include four screening rounds followed by four monitoring rounds. We present results after 12 years of follow-up. Poisson regression method was used to calculate the rate ratios (RRs); two-sided χ(2) was used to calculate the probability.

Results: We recruited 75360 women from 10 clusters in the screening group and 76178 women from 10 comparable clusters in the control group. In the screening group, we achieved 89% participation for screening and 79.4% compliance for diagnosis confirmation. The incidence of invasive cervical cancer was 26.74 per 100000 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 23.41 to 30.74) in the screening group and 27.49 per 100000 (95% CI = 23.66 to 32.09) in the control group. Compliance to treatment for invasive cancer was 86.3% in the screening group and 72.3% in the control group. The screening group showed a statistically significant 31% reduction in cervical cancer mortality (RR = 0.69; 95% CI = 0.54 to 0.88; P = .003).

Conclusions: VIA screening by primary health workers statistically significantly reduced cervical cancer mortality. Our study demonstrates the efficacy of an easily implementable strategy that could prevent 22000 cervical cancer deaths in India and 72600 deaths in resource-poor countries annually.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow diagram of the trial. MSWs = medical social workers; PHWs = primary health workers; TMH = Tata Memorial Hospital; VIA = visual inspection with acetic acid.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Cumulative incidence curve for cervix cancer. Cumulative incidence of cervical cancer in the screening and control groups after 12 years of follow-up. The screening group recruited 75360 women aged 35 to 64 years and had an annual attrition of 2.2%, whereas the control group recruited 76178 women also aged 35 to 64 years and had an annual attrition of 2.3%.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Cumulative mortality curve for cervix cancer. Cumulative mortality from cervical cancer in the screening and control groups after 12 years of follow-up. The screening group recruited 75360 women aged 35 to 64 years and had an annual attrition of 2.2%, whereas the control group recruited 76178 women also aged 35 to 64 years and had an annual attrition of 2.3%.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 2010;127(12):2893–2917 - PubMed
    1. Forouzanfar MH, Foreman KJ, Delossantos AM, et al. Breast and cervical cancer in 187 countries between 1980 and 2010: a systematic analysis. Lancet. 2011;378(9801):1461–1484 - PubMed
    1. Dikshit R, Gupta PC, Ramasundarahettige C, et al. Cancer mortality in India: a nationally representative survey. Lancet. 2012;379(9828):1807–1816 - PubMed
    1. Singh V, Sehgal A, Luthra UK. Screening for cervical cancer by direct inspection. BMJ. 1992;304(6826):534–535 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Guidelines for Cervical Cancer Screening Programme Recommendations of the expert group meeting, 18–19 November 2006; Government of India–World Health Organization Collaborative Programme (2004–2005) Department of Cytology & Gynecological Pathology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India, June 2006. http://www.cytoindia.com/cytology%20eqa/ccsp%20guidelines.pdf Accessed December 19, 2013.

Publication types

MeSH terms