Transvaginal specimen extraction versus conventional minilaparotomy after laparoscopic anterior resection for colorectal cancer: mid-term results of a case-matched study
- PMID: 24566749
- DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3466-1
Transvaginal specimen extraction versus conventional minilaparotomy after laparoscopic anterior resection for colorectal cancer: mid-term results of a case-matched study
Abstract
Background: Although the vagina is considered a viable route during laparoscopic surgery, a number of concerns have led to a need to demonstrate the safety of a transvaginal approach in colorectal surgery. However, the data for transvaginal access in left-sided colorectal cancer are extremely limited, and no study has compared the clinical outcomes with a conventional laparoscopic procedure.
Objective: We compared the clinical outcomes of totally laparoscopic anterior resection with transvaginal specimen extraction (TVSE) with those of the conventional laparoscopic approach with minilaparotomy (LAP) for anastomosis construction and specimen retrieval in left-sided colorectal cancer.
Methods: Fifty-eight patients underwent TVSE between October 2006 and July 2011 and were matched by age, surgery date, tumor location, and tumor stage with patients who underwent conventional LAP for left-sided colorectal cancer.
Results: Operative time was significantly longer in the TVSE group (149.3 ± 39.8 vs. 131.9 ± 41.4 min; p = 0.023). Patients in the TVSE group experienced less pain (pain score 4.9 ± 1.6 vs. 5.8 ± 1.9; p = 0.008), shorter time to passage of flatus (2.2 ± 1.1 vs. 2.7 ± 1.2 days; p = 0.026), and higher satisfaction with the cosmetic results (cosmetic score 8.0 ± 1.4 vs. 6.3 ± 1.5; p = 0.001). More endolinear staplers for rectal transection were used in the LAP group (1.2 ± 0.5 vs. 1.1 ± 0.2; p = 0.021). Overall morbidities were similar in both groups; however, three wound infections only occurred in the LAP group. After a median follow-up of 34.4 (range 11-60) months, no transvaginal access-site recurrence occurred. The 3-year disease-free survival was similar between groups (91.5 vs. 90.8%; p = 0.746).
Conclusions: Transvaginal access after totally laparoscopic anterior resection is safe and feasible for left-sided colorectal cancer in selected patients with better short-term outcomes.
Similar articles
-
Short- and long-term outcomes for transvaginal specimen extraction versus minilaparotomy after robotic anterior resection for colorectal cancer: a mono-institution retrospective study.World J Surg Oncol. 2020 Jul 29;18(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12957-020-01967-9. World J Surg Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32727478 Free PMC article.
-
Totally laparoscopic anterior resection with transvaginal assistance and transvaginal specimen extraction: a technique for natural orifice surgery combined with reduced-port surgery.Surg Endosc. 2013 Dec;27(12):4734-40. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3120-3. Epub 2013 Aug 16. Surg Endosc. 2013. PMID: 23949481 Free PMC article.
-
Laparoscopic Anterior Resection with Transvaginal Specimen Extraction (TVSE) for Colorectal Cancer and Concomitant Total Hysterectomy and Bilateral Salpingo-Oophrectomy (THBSO): A Technical Description.Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Feb;24(2):441. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5478-7. Epub 2016 Aug 5. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017. PMID: 27495281
-
Transvaginal versus transabdominal specimen extraction in minimally invasive surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Jun 3;409(1):172. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03361-5. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024. PMID: 38829526 Free PMC article.
-
[Laparoscopic-assisted resection for colorectal cancer without incision at abdomen versus traditional laparoscopic resection: A Meta-analysis].Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2017 Jan 28;42(1):88-97. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2017.01.015. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2017. PMID: 28216504 Review. Chinese.
Cited by
-
Short- and long-term outcomes for transvaginal specimen extraction versus minilaparotomy after robotic anterior resection for colorectal cancer: a mono-institution retrospective study.World J Surg Oncol. 2020 Jul 29;18(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12957-020-01967-9. World J Surg Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32727478 Free PMC article.
-
Robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus conventional robotic resection for patients with colorectal neoplasms.Front Oncol. 2023 Mar 17;13:1153751. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1153751. eCollection 2023. Front Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37007091 Free PMC article.
-
Laparoscopic colon and rectal resections with intracorporeal anastomosis and trans-vaginal specimen extraction for colorectal cancer. A case series and systematic literature review.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015 Jul;30(7):955-62. doi: 10.1007/s00384-015-2178-x. Epub 2015 Mar 7. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015. PMID: 25749939
-
Safety and Oncological Outcomes of Laparoscopic NOSE Surgery Compared With Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Diseases: A Meta-Analysis.Front Oncol. 2019 Jul 3;9:597. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00597. eCollection 2019. Front Oncol. 2019. PMID: 31334119 Free PMC article.
-
A Case Series of Laparoscopic Colorectal Resections with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction and Systematic Literature Review.Surg J (N Y). 2021 Aug 3;7(3):e203-e208. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1733833. eCollection 2021 Jul. Surg J (N Y). 2021. PMID: 34395873 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials