Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2014 Mar;25(3):682-688.
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu003.

Cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and cetuximab (PFE) with or without cilengitide in recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: results of the randomized phase I/II ADVANTAGE trial (phase II part)

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and cetuximab (PFE) with or without cilengitide in recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: results of the randomized phase I/II ADVANTAGE trial (phase II part)

J B Vermorken et al. Ann Oncol. 2014 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M-SCCHN) overexpresses αvβ5 integrin. Cilengitide selectively inhibits αvβ3 and αvβ5 integrins and is investigated as a treatment strategy.

Patients and methods: The phase I/II study ADVANTAGE evaluated cilengitide combined with cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and cetuximab (PFE) in R/M-SCCHN. The phase II part reported here was an open-label, randomized, controlled trial investigating progression-free survival (PFS). Patients received up to six cycles of PFE alone or combined with cilengitide 2000 mg once (CIL1W) or twice (CIL2W) weekly. Thereafter, patients received maintenance therapy (cilengitide arms: cilengitide plus cetuximab; PFE-alone arm: cetuximab only) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Results: One hundred and eighty-two patients were treated. Median PFS per investigator read was similar for CIL1W + PFE, CIL2W + PFE, and PFE alone (6.4, 5.6, and 5.7 months, respectively). Accordingly, median overall survival and objective response rates were not improved with cilengitide (12.4 months/47%, 10.6 months/27%, and 11.6 months/36%, respectively). No clinically meaningful safety differences were observed between groups. None of the tested biomarkers (expression of integrins, CD31, Ki-67, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2, vascular endothelial-cadherin, type IV collagen, epidermal growth factor receptor, or p16 for human papillomavirus) were predictive of outcome.

Conclusion: Neither of the cilengitide-containing regimens demonstrated a PFS benefit over PFE alone in R/M-SCCHN patients.

Keywords: cetuximab; cilengitide; integrin inhibitor; phase I/II; platinum-based chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil; recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M-SCCHN).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Disposition of patient populations. ITT, intention-to-treat; PFE, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and cetuximab; PFE + CIL1W: cilengitide once weekly plus PFE; PFE + CIL2W: cilengitide twice weekly plus PFE.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Progression-free survival in the ITT population per investigator read (A) and per independent read (B: sensitivity analysis). CI, confidence interval; CIL1W, cilengitide once weekly; CIL2W, cilengitide twice weekly; HR, hazard ratio; ITT, intention-to-treat; PFE, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and cetuximab; PFS, progression-free survival.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Overall survival (ITT population). CI, confidence interval; CIL1W, cilengitide once weekly; CIL2W, cilengitide twice weekly; HR, hazard ratio; ITT, intention-to-treat; OS, overall survival; PFE, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and cetuximab.

References

    1. Vermorken JB, Mesia R, Rivera F, et al. Platinum-based chemotherapy plus cetuximab in head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1116–1127. - PubMed
    1. Mesía R, Rivera F, Kawecki A, et al. Quality of life of patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy plus cetuximab first line for recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Ann Oncol. 2010;21:1967–1973. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Perri F, Longo F, Ionna F, et al. Recent results of cetuximab use in the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. OncoTargets Ther. 2009;2:243–250. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vermorken JB, Specenier P. Optimal treatment for recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer. Ann Oncol. 2010;21(Suppl 7):vii252–vii261. - PubMed
    1. Garmy-Susini B, Varner JA. Roles of integrins in tumor angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Lymphat Res Biol. 2008;6:155–163. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms