Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2014 Jan;64(618):e47-53.
doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X676456.

Effectiveness of general practice-based health checks: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Effectiveness of general practice-based health checks: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Si Si et al. Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Jan.

Abstract

Background: A recent review concluded that general health checks fail to reduce mortality in adults.

Aim: This review focuses on general practice-based health checks and their effects on both surrogate and final outcomes.

Design and setting: Systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials.

Method: Relevant data were extracted from randomised trials comparing the health outcomes of general practice-based health checks versus usual care in middle-aged populations.

Results: Six trials were included. The end-point differences between the intervention and control arms in total cholesterol (TC), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP), and body mass index (BMI) were -0.13 mmol/l (95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.19 to -0.07), -3.65 mmHg (95% CI = -6.50 to -0.81), -1.79 mmHg (95% CI = -2.93 to -0.64), and -0.45 kg/m(2) (95% CI = -0.66 to -0.24), respectively. The odds of a patient remaining at 'high risk' with elevated TC, SBP, DBP, BMI or continuing smoking were 0.63 (95% CI = 0.50 to 0.79), 0.59 (95% CI = 0.28 to 1.23), 0.63 (95% CI = 0.53 to 0.74), 0.89 (95% CI = 0.81 to 0.98), and 0.91 (95% CI = 0.82 to 1.02), respectively. There was little evidence of a difference in total mortality (OR 1.03, 95% CI = 0.90 to 1.18). Higher CVD mortality was observed in the intervention group (OR 1.30, 95% CI = 1.02 to 1.66).

Conclusion: General practice-based health checks are associated with statistically significant, albeit clinically small, improvements in surrogate outcome control, especially among high-risk patients. Most studies were not originally designed to assess mortality.

Keywords: general practice; health check; mortality; primary health care; risk factors; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Study flow diagram.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Summary of bias in included studies.

Comment in

References

    1. Department of Health . Healthy lives, Healthy People: Our strategy for public health in England. London: England; 2010.
    1. Boulware L, Marinopoulos S, Phillips K, et al. Systematic review: the value of the periodic health evaluation. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146(4):289. - PubMed
    1. Krogsbøll LT, Jørgensen KJ, Grønhøj Larsen C, Gøtzsche PC. General health checks in adults for reducing morbidity and mortality from disease: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2012;345:7191. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fleming TR, DeMets DL. Surrogate end points in clinical trials: are we being misled? Ann Intern Med. 1996;125:605–613. - PubMed
    1. Psaty BM, Weiss NS, Furberg CD, et al. Surrogate end points, health outcomes, and the drug-approval process for the treatment of risk factors for cardiovascular disease. JAMA. 1999;282(8):786–790. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources