Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012;32(4):182-8.

[Development of the 60Co gamma-ray standard field for therapy-level dosimeter calibration in terms of absorbed dose to water (N(D,w))]

[Article in Japanese]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 24568023

[Development of the 60Co gamma-ray standard field for therapy-level dosimeter calibration in terms of absorbed dose to water (N(D,w))]

[Article in Japanese]
Akifumi Fukumura et al. Igaku Butsuri. 2012.

Abstract

A primary standard for the absorbed dose rate to water in a 60Co gamma-ray field was established at National Metrology Institute of Japan (NMIJ) in fiscal year 2011. Then, a 60Co gamma-ray standard field for therapy-level dosimeter calibration in terms of absorbed dose to water was developed at National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS) as a secondary standard dosimetry laboratory (SSDL). The results of an IAEA/WHO TLD SSDL audit demonstrated that there was good agreement between NIRS stated absorbed dose to water and IAEA measurements. The IAEA guide based on the ISO standard was used to estimate the relative expanded uncertainty of the calibration factor for a therapy-level Farmer type ionization chamber in terms of absorbed dose to water (N(D,w)) with the new field. The uncertainty of N(D,w) was estimated to be 1.1% (k = 2), which corresponds to approximately one third of the value determined in the existing air kerma field. The dissemination of traceability of the calibration factor determined in the new field is expected to diminish the uncertainty of dose delivered to patients significantly.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Multicentre dose audit for clinical trials of radiation therapy in Asia.
    Mizuno H, Fukuda S, Fukumura A, Nakamura YK, Jianping C, Cho CK, Supriana N, Dung TA, Calaguas MJ, Devi CRB, Chansilpa Y, Banu PA, Riaz M, Esentayeva S, Kato S, Karasawa K, Tsujii H. Mizuno H, et al. J Radiat Res. 2017 May 1;58(3):372-377. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrw108. J Radiat Res. 2017. PMID: 27864507 Free PMC article.

Publication types