Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2014 Apr;68(4):416-23.
doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2014.8. Epub 2014 Feb 26.

Effect of fructose on markers of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD): a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled feeding trials

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Meta-Analysis

Effect of fructose on markers of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD): a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled feeding trials

S Chiu et al. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2014 Apr.
Free PMC article

Abstract

Background/objectives: In the absence of consistent clinical evidence, there are concerns that fructose contributes to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). To determine the effect of fructose on markers of NAFLD, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled feeding trials.

Subjects/methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library (through 3 September 2013). We included relevant trials that involved a follow-up of ≥ 7 days. Two reviewers independently extracted relevant data. Data were pooled by the generic inverse variance method using random effects models and expressed as standardized mean difference (SMD) for intrahepatocellular lipids (IHCL) and mean difference (MD) for alanine aminotransferase (ALT). Inter-study heterogeneity was assessed (Cochran Q statistic) and quantified (I(2) statistic).

Results: Eligibility criteria were met by eight reports containing 13 trials in 260 healthy participants: seven isocaloric trials, in which fructose was exchanged isocalorically for other carbohydrates, and six hypercaloric trials, in which the diet was supplemented with excess energy (+21-35% energy) from high-dose fructose (+104-220 g/day). Although there was no effect of fructose in isocaloric trials, fructose in hypercaloric trials increased both IHCL (SMD=0.45 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.18, 0.72)) and ALT (MD=4.94 U/l (95% CI: 0.03, 9.85)).

Limitations: Few trials were available for inclusion, most of which were small, short (≤ 4 weeks), and of poor quality.

Conclusions: Isocaloric exchange of fructose for other carbohydrates does not induce NAFLD changes in healthy participants. Fructose providing excess energy at extreme doses, however, does raise IHCL and ALT, an effect that may be more attributable to excess energy than fructose. Larger, longer and higher-quality trials of the effect of fructose on histopathological NAFLD changes are required.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow of the literature.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plots of the effect of fructose on intrahepatocellular lipid (IHCL) in healthy participants in (a) isocaloric and (b) hypercaloric feeding trials. Pooled effect estimates shown as diamonds. Data are expressed as weighted MD with 95% CI using generic inverse variance random effects models. Inter-study heterogeneity was tested by Cochrane's Q statistic (χ2-test) at a significance level of P<0.10 and quantified by I2, where I2⩾50% is considered to be evidence of substantial heterogeneity and ⩾75%, considerable heterogeneity. Any CHO denotes any carbohydrate comparator; E neutral, neutral energy balance; E positive, positive energy balance; and Off-T2DM, offspring of T2DM.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plots of the effect of fructose on ALT in healthy participants in (a) isocaloric and (b) hypercaloric feeding trials. Pooled effect estimates shown as diamonds. Data are expressed as weighted MD with 95% CI using generic inverse variance random effects models. Inter-study heterogeneity was tested by Cochrane's Q statistic (χ2-test) at a significance level of P<0.10 and quantified by I2, where I2⩾50% is considered to be evidence of substantial heterogeneity and ⩾75%, considerable heterogeneity. Any CHO denotes any carbohydrate comparator; E neutral, neutral energy balance; E positive, positive energy balance; HD, high dose; LD, low dose; and Off-T2DM, offspring of T2DM.

References

    1. Bhatia LS, Curzen NP, Calder PC, Byrne CD. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a new and important cardiovascular risk factor. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:1190–1200. - PubMed
    1. Lazo M, Clark JM. The epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a global perspective. Semin Liver Dis. 2008;28:339–350. - PubMed
    1. Lazo M, Hernaez R, Bonekamp S, Kamel IR, Brancati FL, Guallar E, et al. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and mortality among US adults: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2011;343:d6891. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lustig RH, Schmidt LA, Brindis CD. Public health: the toxic truth about sugar. Nature. 2012;482:27–29. - PubMed
    1. Lim JS, Mietus-Snyder M, Valente A, Schwarz JM, Lustig RH. The role of fructose in the pathogenesis of NAFLD and the metabolic syndrome. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;7:251–264. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms