Personal exposure to inhalable dust and the specific latex aero-allergen, Hev b6.02, in latex glove manufacturing in Thailand
- PMID: 24569810
- PMCID: PMC4305113
- DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/meu013
Personal exposure to inhalable dust and the specific latex aero-allergen, Hev b6.02, in latex glove manufacturing in Thailand
Erratum in
- Ann Occup Hyg. 2014 Aug;58(7):931
Abstract
Objectives: Latex product manufacturing is an important industry in south-east Asia but has the potential for considerable occupational exposure of workers to latex allergens. Although exposure to latex allergens can result in adverse health reactions, few studies to characterize this exposure have been conducted to date. This study therefore aimed to characterize current airborne inhalable dust and the specific allergen, Hev b 6.02, exposures in this industry in Thailand.
Methods: Workers were recruited from three factories in the southern part of Thailand. Full-shift inhalable dust personal air sampling was conducted using IOM sampling heads equipped with polytetrafluoroethylene filters at a 2.0 l min(-1) flowrate. After weighing to determine inhalable dust levels, filters were extracted and analysed for Hev b 6.02 using an enzyme immunometric assay.
Results: Two hundred and seventy-five workers agreed to participate, resulting in a total of 292 measurements. Geometric mean (GM) personal exposure to inhalable dust was 0.88 mg m(-3), but individual exposures up to 12.34 mg m(-3) were measured. The pattern of exposure was similar across factories, with highest exposures in the stripping (GM 2.08-4.05 mg m(-3) for the 3 factories) and tumbling departments (1.11-2.17 mg m(-3)). Within-worker (day-to-day) variability contributed 92% to total variability. The Hev b 6.02 exposure pattern was similar with time-weighted average GM exposure levels in the oldest factory ranging from 8.7 mg m(-3) in the laboratory to 30.2mg m(-3) in the stripping department. In contrast to inhalable dust exposure, total exposure variability was primary driven by variability between workers (67%).
Conclusions: Workers in these latex product factories get routinely exposed to measurable Hev b 6.02 levels, which may give rise to increased incidence of allergic symptoms and occupational asthma. Also, in this measurement campaign a 10mg m(-3), but not 15 mg m(-3), occupational exposure limit for inhalable dust was occasionally exceeded. Highest Hev b 6.02 exposures were found in the stripping and tumbling departments, which would be natural targets for interventions aimed at reducing exposure.
Keywords: allergens; allergy; glove manufacturing; hev b 6.02; inhalable dust; latex allergens; latex gloves; latex products; occupational asthma; occupational exposure; occupational hygiene.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene Society.
Similar articles
-
Natural rubber latex aeroallergen exposure in rubber plantation workers and glove manufacturers in Thailand and health care workers in a UK hospital.Ann Occup Hyg. 2000 Mar;44(2):79-88. Ann Occup Hyg. 2000. PMID: 10717259
-
Extractable latex allergens in airborne glove powder and in cut glove pieces.Clin Exp Allergy. 2002 Jul;32(7):1077-81. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2222.2002.01413.x. Clin Exp Allergy. 2002. PMID: 12100057
-
A study of natural rubber latex allergens in gloves used by healthcare workers in Singapore.Br J Dermatol. 2005 Nov;153(5):954-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06820.x. Br J Dermatol. 2005. PMID: 16225605
-
Estimation and Validation of Flour Exposure in Bakeries in Alberta, Canada.Ann Work Expo Health. 2018 Nov 12;62(9):1096-1108. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxy078. Ann Work Expo Health. 2018. PMID: 30184166
-
Exposure to grain dust in Great Britain.Ann Occup Hyg. 2012 Jan;56(1):25-36. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mer084. Epub 2011 Oct 5. Ann Occup Hyg. 2012. PMID: 21976307 Review.
Cited by
-
Latex Allergy in Children.J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 25;13(1):124. doi: 10.3390/jcm13010124. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 38202131 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Rethinking cumulative exposure in epidemiology, again.J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2015 Sep-Oct;25(5):467-73. doi: 10.1038/jes.2014.58. Epub 2014 Aug 20. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2015. PMID: 25138292
-
Latex Allergy: Current Status and Future Perspectives.J Asthma Allergy. 2020 Sep 28;13:385-398. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S242058. eCollection 2020. J Asthma Allergy. 2020. PMID: 33061465 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Current prevalence rate of latex allergy: Why it remains a problem?J Occup Health. 2016 May 25;58(2):138-44. doi: 10.1539/joh.15-0275-RA. Epub 2016 Mar 24. J Occup Health. 2016. PMID: 27010091 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Wishful Thinking? Inside the Black Box of Exposure Assessment.Ann Occup Hyg. 2016 May;60(4):421-31. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mev098. Epub 2016 Jan 13. Ann Occup Hyg. 2016. PMID: 26764244 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ahmed DD, Sobczak SC, Yunginger JW. (2003). Occupational allergies caused by latex. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am; 23: 205–19. - PubMed
-
- Ahmed SM, Aw TC, Adisesh A. (2004). Toxicological and immunological aspects of occupational latex allergy. Toxicol Rev; 23: 123–34. - PubMed
-
- Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B. (2013). Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes Available at http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/lme4.pdf Accessed 16 December 2013.
-
- Baur X, Jäger D. (1990). Airborne antigens from latex gloves. Lancet; 335: 912. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous