Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jun;58(5):542-50.
doi: 10.1093/annhyg/meu013. Epub 2014 Feb 25.

Personal exposure to inhalable dust and the specific latex aero-allergen, Hev b6.02, in latex glove manufacturing in Thailand

Affiliations

Personal exposure to inhalable dust and the specific latex aero-allergen, Hev b6.02, in latex glove manufacturing in Thailand

Nuthchyawach Sanguanchaiyakrit et al. Ann Occup Hyg. 2014 Jun.

Erratum in

  • Ann Occup Hyg. 2014 Aug;58(7):931

Abstract

Objectives: Latex product manufacturing is an important industry in south-east Asia but has the potential for considerable occupational exposure of workers to latex allergens. Although exposure to latex allergens can result in adverse health reactions, few studies to characterize this exposure have been conducted to date. This study therefore aimed to characterize current airborne inhalable dust and the specific allergen, Hev b 6.02, exposures in this industry in Thailand.

Methods: Workers were recruited from three factories in the southern part of Thailand. Full-shift inhalable dust personal air sampling was conducted using IOM sampling heads equipped with polytetrafluoroethylene filters at a 2.0 l min(-1) flowrate. After weighing to determine inhalable dust levels, filters were extracted and analysed for Hev b 6.02 using an enzyme immunometric assay.

Results: Two hundred and seventy-five workers agreed to participate, resulting in a total of 292 measurements. Geometric mean (GM) personal exposure to inhalable dust was 0.88 mg m(-3), but individual exposures up to 12.34 mg m(-3) were measured. The pattern of exposure was similar across factories, with highest exposures in the stripping (GM 2.08-4.05 mg m(-3) for the 3 factories) and tumbling departments (1.11-2.17 mg m(-3)). Within-worker (day-to-day) variability contributed 92% to total variability. The Hev b 6.02 exposure pattern was similar with time-weighted average GM exposure levels in the oldest factory ranging from 8.7 mg m(-3) in the laboratory to 30.2mg m(-3) in the stripping department. In contrast to inhalable dust exposure, total exposure variability was primary driven by variability between workers (67%).

Conclusions: Workers in these latex product factories get routinely exposed to measurable Hev b 6.02 levels, which may give rise to increased incidence of allergic symptoms and occupational asthma. Also, in this measurement campaign a 10mg m(-3), but not 15 mg m(-3), occupational exposure limit for inhalable dust was occasionally exceeded. Highest Hev b 6.02 exposures were found in the stripping and tumbling departments, which would be natural targets for interventions aimed at reducing exposure.

Keywords: allergens; allergy; glove manufacturing; hev b 6.02; inhalable dust; latex allergens; latex gloves; latex products; occupational asthma; occupational exposure; occupational hygiene.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Latex Allergy in Children.
    Arasi S, Barni S, Caminiti L, Castagnoli R, Giovannini M, Liotti L, Mastrorilli C, Mori F, Pecoraro L, Saretta F, Gelsomino M, Klain A, Miraglia Del Giudice M, Novembre E. Arasi S, et al. J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 25;13(1):124. doi: 10.3390/jcm13010124. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 38202131 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Rethinking cumulative exposure in epidemiology, again.
    de Vocht F, Burstyn I, Sanguanchaiyakrit N. de Vocht F, et al. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2015 Sep-Oct;25(5):467-73. doi: 10.1038/jes.2014.58. Epub 2014 Aug 20. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2015. PMID: 25138292
  • Latex Allergy: Current Status and Future Perspectives.
    Nucera E, Aruanno A, Rizzi A, Centrone M. Nucera E, et al. J Asthma Allergy. 2020 Sep 28;13:385-398. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S242058. eCollection 2020. J Asthma Allergy. 2020. PMID: 33061465 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Current prevalence rate of latex allergy: Why it remains a problem?
    Wu M, McIntosh J, Liu J. Wu M, et al. J Occup Health. 2016 May 25;58(2):138-44. doi: 10.1539/joh.15-0275-RA. Epub 2016 Mar 24. J Occup Health. 2016. PMID: 27010091 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Wishful Thinking? Inside the Black Box of Exposure Assessment.
    Money A, Robinson C, Agius R, de Vocht F. Money A, et al. Ann Occup Hyg. 2016 May;60(4):421-31. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mev098. Epub 2016 Jan 13. Ann Occup Hyg. 2016. PMID: 26764244 Free PMC article.

References

    1. Ahmed DD, Sobczak SC, Yunginger JW. (2003). Occupational allergies caused by latex. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am; 23: 205–19. - PubMed
    1. Ahmed SM, Aw TC, Adisesh A. (2004). Toxicological and immunological aspects of occupational latex allergy. Toxicol Rev; 23: 123–34. - PubMed
    1. Alenius H, Turjanmaa K, Palosuo T. (2002). Natural rubber latex allergy. Occup Environ Med; 59: 419–24. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B. (2013). Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes Available at http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/lme4.pdf Accessed 16 December 2013.
    1. Baur X, Jäger D. (1990). Airborne antigens from latex gloves. Lancet; 335: 912. - PubMed

Publication types