Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Mar;64 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):29-34.
doi: 10.1111/idj.12100.

Protective benefits of a stabilised stannous-containing fluoride dentifrice against erosive acid damage

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Protective benefits of a stabilised stannous-containing fluoride dentifrice against erosive acid damage

Robert V Faller et al. Int Dent J. 2014 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the potential of a stabilised stannous (Sn)-containing NaF dentifrice (Oral B/blend-a-Med(®) Pro-Expert), in addition to a number of other marketed European dentifrices formulated with various fluoride actives and two control dentifrices, to protect enamel against erosive acid damage.

Methods: Cores of human enamel (four per group) were soaked in pooled human saliva, and then treated with a 1:3 slurry (dentifrice:saliva) using a standardised in vitro erosion model (5-day cycling) that includes 10-minute challenges with 1% citric acid applied 60 minutes after each dentifrice treatment. Enamel surface loss was measured using transverse microradiography (TMR).

Results: Specimens treated with the Sn-containing NaF dentifrice showed 6.5 μm of surface loss ± 1.2 (SEM), which was not significantly different (P < 0.05, Fisher LSD) from that of a clinically proven, stabilised SnF2 positive control [Crest(®) Pro-Health, 1,100 ppm F as SnF2 : 3.0 μm of surface loss ± 1.1 (SEM)]. The Sn-containing NaF dentifrice and the clinically proven positive control both provided significantly greater protection (P < 0.05, Fisher LSD) compared with all of the other products tested. Enamel loss (SEM) values for other European products and the reference control (active agents) were: Meridol(®) : (1,400 ppm F as AmF + SnF2 ) 12.0 μm (1.47); Colgate(®) Cavity Protection: (1,450 ppm F as SMFP + NaF) 12.9 μm (1.66); Odol med 3(®) (1,400 ppm F as NaF) 14.2 μm (1.49); Elmex(®) (1,400 ppm F as AmF) 14.5 μm (1.76); Colgate(®) Enamel Protect: (1,450 ppm F as NaF + KNO3 ) 16.3 μm (2.02); Lacalut(®) aktiv: (1,400 ppm F as AlF3 ) 18.5 μm (1.71); Sensodyne(®) ProNamel(™) : (1,450 ppm F as NaF + KNO3 ) 20.5 μm (1.26); Crest Cavity Protection (1,100 ppm F as NaF, reference control) 22.00 μm (2.04); and Mentadent(®) : (1,450 ppm F as NaF + Zn citrate) 22.3 μm (0.63).

Conclusion: These results support the potential for the stabilised, Sn-containing NaF dentifrice to provide erosion protection benefits that are not significantly different from the positive control benchmark for erosion protection (stabilised SnF2 ), and are significantly better than a broad range of dentifrice formulations available on the European market.

Keywords: Erosion; Sn-containing; dentifrice; fluoride; stannous.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Visual description of the model. (a) example of a 3 mm core of human enamel removed from an extracted, human tooth; (b) 3 mm cores of enamel after mounting in ¼ inch (0.64 cm) diameter Lucite rods, then ground and polished in preparation for the study (left) and after placement of nail polish on the tooth surface, leaving a treatment window approximately 0.4 mm wide; (c) each group of four specimens was mounted in a holding appliance that enabled treatment of all specimens in the group at the same time; (d) the holding appliance with four rod-mounted specimens is attached to the bit of a controlled-speed motor and suspended for treatment; (e) after treatment, each group of specimens is suspended in pooled, human saliva using gentle agitation (stirring bars) over a multi-place stir-plate.
Table 2
Table 2
Results and statistical analysis

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. White D, Cox E, Suszcynskymeister E, et al. In vitro studies of the anticalculus efficacy of a sodium hexametaphosphate whitening dentifrice. J Clin Dent. 2002;13:33–37. - PubMed
    1. White DJ, Cox ER. In vitro studies of the anticalculus efficacy of an improved whitening dentifrice. J Clin Dent. 2001;12:38–41. - PubMed
    1. Featherstone JD, Shariati M, Brugler S, et al. Effect of an anticalculus dentifrice on lesion progression under pH cycling conditions in vitro. Caries Res. 1988;22:337–341. - PubMed
    1. Nathoo S, Mateo LR, Delgado E, et al. Extrinsic stain removal efficacy of a new dentifrice containing 0.3% triclosan, 2.0% PVM/MA copolymer, 0.243% NaF and specially-designed silica for sensitivity relief and whitening benefits as compared to a dentifrice containing 0.3% triclosan, 2% PVM/MA copolymer, 0.243% NaF and to a negative control dentifrice containing 0.243% NaF: a 6-week study. Am J Dent. 2011;24:28A–31A. Spec No A. - PubMed
    1. Yudhira R, Peumans M, Barker ML, et al. Clinical trial of tooth whitening with 6% hydrogen peroxide whitening strips and two whitening dentifrices. Am J Dent. 2007;20:32A–36A. Spec No A. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms