Red blood cell transfusion in septic shock - clinical characteristics and outcome of unselected patients in a prospective, multicentre cohort
- PMID: 24571858
- PMCID: PMC3938972
- DOI: 10.1186/1757-7241-22-14
Red blood cell transfusion in septic shock - clinical characteristics and outcome of unselected patients in a prospective, multicentre cohort
Abstract
Background: Treating anaemia with red blood cell (RBC) transfusion is frequent, but controversial, in patients with septic shock. Therefore we assessed characteristics and outcome associated with RBC transfusion in this group of high risk patients.
Methods: We did a prospective cohort study at 7 general intensive care units (ICUs) including all adult patients with septic shock in a 5-month period.
Results: Ninety-five of the 213 included patients (45%) received median 3 (interquartile range 2-5) RBC units during shock. The median pre-transfusion haemoglobin level was 8.1 (7.4-8.9) g/dl and independent of shock day and bleeding. Patients with cardiovascular disease were transfused at higher haemoglobin levels. Transfused patients had higher Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II (56 (45-69) vs. 48 (37-61), p = 0.0005), more bleeding episodes, lower haemoglobin levels days 1 to 5, higher Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores (days 1 and 5), more days in shock (5 (3-10) vs. 2 (2-4), p = 0.0001), more days in ICU (10 (4-19) vs. 4 (2-8), p = 0.0001) and higher 90-day mortality (66 vs. 43%, p = 0.001). The latter association was lost after adjustment for admission category and SAPS II and SOFA-score on day 1.
Conclusions: The decision to transfuse patients with septic shock was likely affected by disease severity and bleeding, but haemoglobin level was the only measure that consistently differed between transfused and non-transfused patients.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Is haemoglobin below 7.0 g/dL an optimal trigger for allogenic red blood cell transfusion in patients admitted to intensive care units? A meta-analysis and systematic review.BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 5;10(2):e030854. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030854. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 32029484 Free PMC article.
-
Red blood cell transfusion during septic shock in the ICU.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 Jul;56(6):718-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2012.02666.x. Epub 2012 Mar 5. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012. PMID: 22385470
-
Long-term outcomes in patients with septic shock transfused at a lower versus a higher haemoglobin threshold: the TRISS randomised, multicentre clinical trial.Intensive Care Med. 2016 Nov;42(11):1685-1694. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4437-x. Epub 2016 Sep 30. Intensive Care Med. 2016. PMID: 27686345 Clinical Trial.
-
Transfusion requirements in septic shock (TRISS) trial - comparing the effects and safety of liberal versus restrictive red blood cell transfusion in septic shock patients in the ICU: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.Trials. 2013 May 23;14:150. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-150. Trials. 2013. PMID: 23702006 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Red blood cell transfusion strategies in critically ill patients: lessons from recent randomized clinical studies.Minerva Anestesiol. 2016 Sep;82(9):1010-6. Epub 2016 Jan 12. Minerva Anestesiol. 2016. PMID: 26756380 Review.
Cited by
-
Testing current practice is no mistake.Intensive Care Med. 2015 May;41(5):960. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-3774-5. Epub 2015 Apr 8. Intensive Care Med. 2015. PMID: 25851387 No abstract available.
-
Is haemoglobin below 7.0 g/dL an optimal trigger for allogenic red blood cell transfusion in patients admitted to intensive care units? A meta-analysis and systematic review.BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 5;10(2):e030854. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030854. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 32029484 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of transfusion on patients with sepsis admitted in intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Ann Intensive Care. 2017 Dec;7(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13613-016-0226-5. Epub 2017 Jan 4. Ann Intensive Care. 2017. PMID: 28050898 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Pre-clinical study protocol: Blood transfusion in endotoxaemic shock.MethodsX. 2019 May 9;6:1124-1132. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2019.05.005. eCollection 2019. MethodsX. 2019. PMID: 31193460 Free PMC article.
-
Transfusion transmitted diseases in perioperative and intensive care settings.Indian J Anaesth. 2014 Sep;58(5):552-7. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.144651. Indian J Anaesth. 2014. PMID: 25535416 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, Annane D, Gerlach H, Opal SM, Sevransky JE, Sprung CL, Douglas IS, Jaeschke R, Osborn TM, Nunnally ME, Townsend SR, Reinhart K, Kleinpell RM, Angus DC, Deutschman CS, Machado FR, Rubenfeld GD, Webb S, Beale RJ, Vincent J-L, Moreno R. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39:165–228. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2769-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Hebert PC, Wells G, Blajchman MA, Marshall J, Martin C, Pagliarello G, Tweeddale M, Schweitzer I, Yetisir E. A multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial of transfusion requirements in critical care. Transfusion requirements in Critical Care Investigators, Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:409–417. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199902113400601. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical