A phase II open-label randomized multicenter trial of TSU-68 in combination with S-1 and oxaliplatin versus S-1 in combination with oxaliplatin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
- PMID: 24573743
- DOI: 10.1007/s10637-014-0075-8
A phase II open-label randomized multicenter trial of TSU-68 in combination with S-1 and oxaliplatin versus S-1 in combination with oxaliplatin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
Abstract
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The combination of oxaliplatin-based treatments (oxaliplatin plus infusional 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin [FOLFOX] or oxaliplatin plus capecitabine [CapeOX]) and bevacizumab is a standard chemotherapy regimen for metastatic CRC (mCRC). However, several clinical studies that tested S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) indicate that SOX is also a treatment option for mCRC. TSU-68 is an oral compound that inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and platelet-derived growth factor receptor. The recommended dose of TSU-68 + SOX was previously determined in a phase I study of mCRC patients. The goal of this trial was to evaluate the efficacy of TSU-68 in combination with SOX.
Methods: This open-label multicenter randomized phase II trial was performed in Korea. Treatment-naive mCRC patients with a performance status of 0 or 1 were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either TSU-68 + SOX or SOX alone. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).
Results: A total of 105 patients (TSU-68 + SOX, 52 patients; SOX alone, 53 patients) were randomized. The median PFS was 7.0 months in the TSU-68 + SOX group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.057) and 7.2 months in the SOX group (p = 0.8401). The most frequent grade 3 and 4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (9.6 % [TSU-68 + SOX] vs. 26.4 % [SOX]), neutropenia (13.5 % [TSU-68 + SOX] vs. 15.1 % [SOX]), and anemia (3.8 % [TSU-68 + SOX] vs. 13.2 % [SOX]). We observed a difference between the 2 groups for all grades of anemia (15.4 % [TSU-68 + SOX] vs. 32.1 % [SOX]), diarrhea (30.8 % [TSU-68 + SOX] vs. 47.2 % [SOX]), vomiting (50.0 % [TSU-68 + SOX] vs. 26.4 % [SOX]), and chromaturia (23.1 % [TSU-68 + SOX] vs. 0.0 % [SOX]). Analysis using a Cox proportional hazard model showed that baseline interleukin 6 (IL-6) levels were associated with a survival benefit of TSU-68 (p = 0.012).
Conclusion: TSU-68 + SOX had a favorable safety profile. However, TSU-68 did not have a synergistic effect on the efficacy of SOX. The baseline serum IL-6 level could be a prognostic factor for TSU-68 efficacy.
Similar articles
-
A phase I pharmacokinetic study of TSU-68 (a multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitor of VEGFR-2, FGF and PDFG) in combination with S-1 and oxaliplatin in metastatic colorectal cancer patients previously treated with chemotherapy.Invest New Drugs. 2012 Aug;30(4):1501-10. doi: 10.1007/s10637-011-9683-8. Epub 2011 May 13. Invest New Drugs. 2012. PMID: 21567184 Clinical Trial.
-
S-1 plus oxaliplatin versus capecitabine plus oxaliplatin for first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomised, non-inferiority phase 3 trial.Lancet Oncol. 2012 Nov;13(11):1125-32. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70363-7. Epub 2012 Oct 10. Lancet Oncol. 2012. PMID: 23062232 Clinical Trial.
-
Leucovorin, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin plus bevacizumab versus S-1 and oxaliplatin plus bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (SOFT): an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised phase 3 trial.Lancet Oncol. 2013 Dec;14(13):1278-86. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70490-X. Epub 2013 Nov 11. Lancet Oncol. 2013. PMID: 24225157 Clinical Trial.
-
FOLFOX plus anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody (mAb) is an effective first-line treatment for patients with RAS-wild left-sided metastatic colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis.Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Mar;97(10):e0097. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010097. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018. PMID: 29517682 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparison of efficacy and safety of S-1 and capecitabine in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jul;98(30):e16667. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016667. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019. PMID: 31348323 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
A network meta-analysis of efficacy and safety for first-line and maintenance therapies in patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases.Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jul 26;15:1374136. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1374136. eCollection 2024. Front Pharmacol. 2024. PMID: 39130637 Free PMC article.
-
Current Molecular Targeted Agents for Advanced Gastric Cancer.Onco Targets Ther. 2020 May 12;13:4075-4088. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S246412. eCollection 2020. Onco Targets Ther. 2020. PMID: 32494161 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous