Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Dec;48(3):293-9.
doi: 10.1007/s12160-014-9595-x.

Does electronic monitoring influence adherence to medication? Randomized controlled trial of measurement reactivity

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Does electronic monitoring influence adherence to medication? Randomized controlled trial of measurement reactivity

Stephen Sutton et al. Ann Behav Med. 2014 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Electronic monitoring is recommended for accurate measurement of medication adherence but a possible limitation is that it may influence adherence.

Purpose: To test the reactive effect of electronic monitoring in a randomized controlled trial.

Methods: A total of 226 adults with type 2 diabetes and HbA1c ≥58 mmol/mol were randomized to receiving their main oral glucose lowering medication in electronic containers or standard packaging. The primary outcomes were self-reported adherence measured with the MARS (Medication Adherence Report Scale; range 5-25) and HbA1c at 8 weeks.

Results: Non-significantly higher adherence and lower HbA1c were observed in the electronic container group (differences in means, adjusting for baseline value: MARS, 0.4 [95 % CI -0.1 to 0.8, p = 0.11]; HbA1c (mmol/mol), -1.02 [-2.73 to 0.71, p = 0.25]).

Conclusions: Electronic containers may lead to a small increase in adherence but this potential limitation is outweighed by their advantages. Our findings support electronic monitoring as the method of choice in research on medication adherence. (Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCT N30522359).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow of participants through trial
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Proportion of participants in the electronic container arm taking their main oral glucose-lowering medication as prescribed on each day of monitoring

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Osterberg L, Blaschke T. Adherence to medication. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:487–97. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra050100. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berg KM, Arnsten JH. Practical and conceptual challenges in measuring antiretroviral adherence. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006;43:S70–87. doi: 10.1097/01.qai.0000248337.97814.66. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Greenlaw SM, Yentzer BA, O’Neill JL, Balkrishnan R, Feldman SR. Assessing adherence to dermatology treatments: A review of self-report and electronic measures. Skin Res Technol. 2010;16:253–258. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0846.2010.00431.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Saini SD, Schoenfeld P, Kaulback K, Dubinsky MC. Effect of medication dosing frequency on adherence in chronic diseases. Am J Manag Care. 2009;15:e22–e33. - PubMed
    1. Vrijens B, Vincze G, Kristanto P, Urquhart J, Burnier M. Adherence to prescribed antihypertensive drug treatments: Longitudinal study of electronically compiled dosing histories. Br Med J. 2008;336:1114–1117. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39553.670231.25. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types