Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 May;52(5):1737-40.
doi: 10.1128/JCM.00328-14. Epub 2014 Feb 26.

Performance of panfungal--and specific-PCR-based procedures for etiological diagnosis of invasive fungal diseases on tissue biopsy specimens with proven infection: a 7-year retrospective analysis from a reference laboratory

Affiliations

Performance of panfungal--and specific-PCR-based procedures for etiological diagnosis of invasive fungal diseases on tissue biopsy specimens with proven infection: a 7-year retrospective analysis from a reference laboratory

M J Buitrago et al. J Clin Microbiol. 2014 May.

Abstract

A retrospective analysis of real-time PCR (RT-PCR) results for 151 biopsy samples obtained from 132 patients with proven invasive fungal diseases was performed. PCR-based techniques proved to be fast and sensitive and enabled definitive diagnosis in all cases studied, with detection of a total of 28 fungal species.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Schematic diagram of procedures performed with biopsy samples, depending on clinical suspicion. When specific assay results were negative, a panfungal assay was performed. *, specific assays detected the following species: A. fumigatus, A. terreus, A. flavus, Histoplasma capsulatum, Paracoccidioides brasiliensis, Rhizopus oryzae, Rhizopus microsporus, Mucor spp., Fusarium spp., Scedosporium prolificans, and Scedosporium apiospermum.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cuenca-Estrella M, Bassetti M, Lass-Florl C, Racil Z, Richardson M, Rogers TR. 2011. Detection and investigation of invasive mould disease. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 66(Suppl 1):i15–i24. 10.1093/jac/dkq438 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cuenca-Estrella M, Bernal-Martinez L, Buitrago MJ, Castelli MV, Gomez-Lopez A, Zaragoza O, Rodriguez-Tudela JL. 2008. Update on the epidemiology and diagnosis of invasive fungal infection. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 32(Suppl 2):S143–S147. 10.1016/S0924-8579(08)70016-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. De Pauw B, Walsh TJ, Donnelly JP, Stevens DA, Edwards JE, Calandra T, Pappas PG, Maertens J, Lortholary O, Kauffman CA, Denning DW, Patterson TF, Maschmeyer G, Bille J, Dismukes WE, Herbrecht R, Hope WW, Kibbler CC, Kullberg BJ, Marr KA, Munoz P, Odds FC, Perfect JR, Restrepo A, Ruhnke M, Segal BH, Sobel JD, Sorrell TC, Viscoli C, Wingard JR, Zaoutis T, Bennett JE. 2008. Revised definitions of invasive fungal disease from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) Consensus Group. Clin. Infect. Dis. 46:1813–1821. 10.1086/588660 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mrazek C, Lass-Florl C. 2011. Biopsy procedures for molecular tissue diagnosis of invasive fungal infections. Curr. Infect. Dis. Rep. 13:504–509. 10.1007/s11908-011-0215-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Buitrago MJ, Aguado JM, Ballen A, Bernal-Martinez L, Prieto M, Garcia-Reyne A, Garcia-Rodriguez J, Rodriguez-Tudela JL, Cuenca-Estrella M. 2013. Efficacy of DNA amplification in tissue biopsy samples to improve the detection of invasive fungal disease. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 19:E271–E277. 10.1111/1469-0691.12110 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources