Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Apr;22(4):137-8.
doi: 10.1007/s12471-014-0538-8.

Impact factor 2013 of the Netherlands Heart Journal surpasses 2.0

Affiliations

Impact factor 2013 of the Netherlands Heart Journal surpasses 2.0

T Opthof. Neth Heart J. 2014 Apr.

Abstract

The impact factor of the Netherlands Heart Journal was stable at about 1.4 between 2009 and 2012. In 2013 it will break through the 2.0 barrier for the first time.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Impact factor of the Netherlands Heart Journal between 2009 (first impact factor) and 2013. Values for 2009–2012 are official Thomson Reuters data as published in their Journal Citation Reports. The IF 2013 was estimated on the basis of citations in the Web of Science between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2013 to papers published by NHJ in 2011 and 2012
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Immediacy index of the Netherlands Heart Journal between 2009 (first immediacy index) and 2013. Values for 2009–2012 are official Thomson Reuters data as published in their Journal Citation Reports. The immediacy index 2013 was estimated on the basis of citations in the Web of Science between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2013 to papers published by NHJ in 2013
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Average citation of articles or reviews published by the Netherlands Heart Journal in 2011 and 2012 during 2013. These numbers can be regarded as an impact factor for 2013, if the journal had only published original articles or only reviews

References

    1. Opthof T. The impact factor of the Netherlands Heart Journal in 2013. Neth Heart J. 2013;21:319–21. doi: 10.1007/s12471-013-0443-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Seglen PO. From bad to worse: evaluation by Journal Impact. Trends Biochem Sci. 1989;14:326–7. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(89)90163-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Opthof T. Sense and nonsense about the impact factor. Cardiovasc Res. 1997;33:1–7. doi: 10.1016/S0008-6363(96)00215-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Seglen PO. Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ. 1997;314:498–502. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7079.497. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Opthof T, Coronel R, Piper HM. Impact factors: no totum pro parte by skewness of citation. Cardiovasc Res. 2004;61:201–3. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2003.11.023. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources