Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jun;25(2):200-12.
doi: 10.1007/s12110-014-9194-3.

How well do men's faces and voices index mate quality and dominance?

Affiliations

How well do men's faces and voices index mate quality and dominance?

Leslie M Doll et al. Hum Nat. 2014 Jun.

Abstract

Previous studies have used self-ratings or strangers' ratings to assess men's attractiveness and dominance, attributes that have likely affected men's access to mates throughout human evolution. However, attractiveness and dominance include more than isolated impressions; they incorporate knowledge gained through social interaction. We tested whether dominance and attractiveness assessed by acquaintances can be predicted from (1) strangers' ratings made from facial photographs and vocal clips and (2) self-ratings. Two university social fraternities, their socially affiliated sororities, and independent raters evaluated men's short- and long-term attractiveness, fighting ability, and leadership ability. Ratings made by unfamiliar men using faces, but not voices, predicted acquaintance-rated fighting and leadership ability, whereas ratings made by unfamiliar women from faces and voices predicted acquaintance-rated short- and long-term attractiveness. Except for leadership, self-ratings aligned with peers' evaluations. These findings support the conclusion that faces and voices provide valuable information about dominance and mate quality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Arch Sex Behav. 2011 Jun;40(3):551-7 - PubMed
    1. Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Feb 7;276(1656):575-84 - PubMed
    1. Vision Res. 2009 Mar;49(8):862-9 - PubMed
    1. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Jun;82(6):947-55 - PubMed
    1. PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e26653 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources