Local feature suppression effect in face and non-face stimuli
- PMID: 24578162
- DOI: 10.1007/s00426-014-0548-6
Local feature suppression effect in face and non-face stimuli
Abstract
There is evidence that the cognitive system processes human faces faster and more precisely than other stimuli. Also, faces summon visual attention in an automatic manner, as evidenced by efficient, 'pop-out' search for face targets amongst homogeneous non-face distractors. Pop-out for faces implies that faces are processed as a basic visual 'feature' by specialized face-tuned detectors, similar to the coding of other features (e.g., color, orientation, motion, etc.). However, it is unclear whether such face detectors encode only the global face configuration or both global and local face features. If the former were correct, the face detectors should be unable to support search for a local face feature, rendering search slower relative to non-face stimuli; that is, there would be local feature suppression (LFS) for faces. If the latter was the case, there should be no difference in the processing of local and, respectively, global face features. In two experiments, participants discerned the presence (vs. absence) of a local target defined as a part of either a normal or a scrambled (schematic or realistic) face or of a non-face (Kanizsa diamond or realistic house) configuration. The results consistently showed a robust LFS effect in both reaction times and error rates for face stimuli, and either no difference or even a local feature enhancement effect for the control stimuli. Taken together, these findings indicate that faces are encoded as a basic visual feature by means of globally tuned face detectors.
Similar articles
-
Similar distraction, but differential suppression, for faces and non-face objects: Evidence from behaviour and event-related potentials.Biol Psychol. 2018 Nov;139:39-46. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2018.09.011. Epub 2018 Oct 4. Biol Psychol. 2018. PMID: 30292783
-
Attentional capture by completely task-irrelevant faces.Psychol Res. 2015 Jul;79(4):523-33. doi: 10.1007/s00426-014-0599-8. Epub 2014 Jul 17. Psychol Res. 2015. PMID: 25030814
-
Intact attentional orienting towards inverted faces revealed by both manual responses and eye-movement measurement in individuals with Williams syndrome.J Intellect Disabil Res. 2016 Oct;60(10):969-81. doi: 10.1111/jir.12318. Epub 2016 Aug 1. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2016. PMID: 27476718
-
Dual-target cost in visual search for multiple unfamiliar faces.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Aug;43(8):1504-1519. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000388. Epub 2017 Apr 3. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017. PMID: 28368160
-
A visual search advantage for illusory faces in objects.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 Jul;83(5):1942-1953. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02267-4. Epub 2021 Mar 25. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021. PMID: 33768481
Cited by
-
Neurophysiological Correlates of Featural and Spacing Processing for Face and Non-face Stimuli.Front Psychol. 2017 Mar 13;8:333. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00333. eCollection 2017. Front Psychol. 2017. PMID: 28348535 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources